The wily leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-il, appears to have taken a giant step toward getting his nation accepted as a nuclear weapons state.
When the North and South Koreans announced last week that South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun had been granted a summit meeting in Pyongyang late this month, immediate speculation held that Roh would try to persuade Kim to abandon his nuclear ambitions.
Skeptical South Koreans, Americans, and Japanese experienced in analyzing North Korea contended that, instead, Kim would urge Roh to acknowledge that North Korea had become a nuclear weapons state.
A former foreign minister of South Korea, Han Sung-joo, said at an academic conference in Honolulu that despite the apparent progress in negotiations intended to end Kim Jong-il's nuclear ambitions, "North Korea is on the way to being recognized as a nuclear weapons state."
Han said the critical question for South Korea, Japan, the US, China and Russia, which have been negotiating with North Korea in six party talks, was to determine "how we can live with a North Korea that has nuclear weapons."
Kim has been seeking for years to have nations represented in the negotiations agree that his nation had been armed with nuclear weapons.
India and Pakistan disclosed they had acquired nuclear weapons by testing them in 1998. North Korea tested a nuclear device last October. As agreed in February, North Korea has shut down its nuclear plant in Yongbyon, but nothing more.
In Asia, the political leader who travels to see another is often considered a supplicant before a superior in a position to demand concessions. Kim is expected to urge Roh to concede North Korea's right to retain nuclear arms, estimated at 10 to 12 weapons, in return for a pledge of peace.
That was underscored when Roh agreed to go to Pyongyang even though Kim had promised, during a summit in Pyongyang with then South Korean president Kim Dae-jung in 2000, that he would make a return visit to Seoul. He has not kept that pledge and Roh has brushed it aside.
A Roh concession to Kim Jong-il on nuclear arms would most likely crack the unity of the five nations bargaining with North Korea in talks hosted by China in Beijing. Both South Korean and US sources said Washington was given only a few hours notice that the summit would be announced. Presumably, Beijing, Tokyo and Moscow were given similar short notice.
Moreover, Han said, allowing North Korea to have nuclear arms would make South Korea and Japan, against which North Korea has aimed hundreds of missiles, even more dependent on the US for security, especially the "nuclear umbrella."
That would require a US retaliatory strike if North Korea attacked either South Korea or Japan.
In addition to concessions from South Korea, the summit is intended to shore up Kim Jong-il's standing at home. Repeated rumors have wafted out of the hermit kingdom that Kim Jong-il is either ill or a group of dissenters have become dissatisfied with his rule, especially the mismanagement of the economy.
Kim Jong-il has sought to dispel those rumors by visiting army posts and factories.
Last week, he gave "on-site guidance" to workers at the Songjin Steel Complex. The official Korean Central News Agency said Kim Jong-ilurged them to display "revolutionary enthusiasm and creative ingenuity under the difficult situation," an oblique reference to North Korea's crumbling economy.
Further, Kim Jong-il is evidently seeking to influence South Korea's presidential election in December so that a candidate favoring concessions to North Korea would be elected. Similarly, South Koreans said Roh hopes to influence the campaign to help elect a candidate who would follow his policies. Roh is limited to one five-year term.
Choson Ilbo, a newspaper generally critical of Roh, opposed the summit meeting, asserting: "This is a presidential election scheme."
The paper continued: "There's no national consensus, no transparency in the way it was arranged and no justification."
The South Korean government said a senior intelligence officer had set up the summit in two secret trips to Pyongyang recently. A presidential spokesman contended: "The spirit of the upcoming summit is reconciliation and transparency."
Choson Ilbo further asserted: "There's no way of knowing what kind of political deal has been struck under the table."
That referred to reports of secret payments made by Kim Dae-jung to North Korea for his summit in 2000.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations