As US Democratic presidential candidates and senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton broach the topic of education reform in the US and rail about the ills plaguing the country's public education system, living in Asia has taught me what the US is doing right.
I did time in the taxpayer-funded classrooms of Palm Beach County as a first-generation Taiwanese-American growing up in south Florida before entering two of Chicago's top private universities.
I received my first pedagogical taste of the East last fall when I returned to my ancestral homeland to study at National Taiwan Normal University. There, from my fellow students and city chums, I discovered the high cost of too much schooling.
Academia is big business in Taiwan, as it is in the rest of East Asia -- the mystifying reverence for education, so they say, extending from Confucian legacy. In my case, it also runs in the family. My mother and father are university professors in Taiwan, and my aunts, uncles, and cousins all belong to the blackboard-instructing rank and file. There are more than 100 institutions of higher learning in this country. That's not including the number of bushibans, which have mushroomed over the years. In 1996, there were 2,625 cram schools in the country. A decade later, 14,231 schools exist -- more than five-times as many.
Indicative of the nation's test-obsessed culture, my roommate in Taipei, a bright China Airlines flight attendant named Kaiyi, described to me how she enrolled in a bushiban to up her chances of getting into stewardess school.
So what if bushibans aren't compulsory? They might as well be.
For almost every profession in the country, mind-numbing, multiple-choice exams have to be passed, and to prepare the young for the rote learning ahead, exist these glorified institutions. Aspiring dentists, future diplomats, budding chefs and prospective law enforcement officers all have their bushibans in addition to their specialized training.
A fanatical emphasis is placed on uniformity in Asia. Educators want to appear objective, so creativity is choked in the pursuit of hard numbers and cold facts. Many students live in fear of the whip (more than half of Taiwanese students in a recent poll claim they've received some form of corporeal punishment -- though a recent bill has been drafted to ban it). By the end of grade school, children are drilled for examination hell like automatons, memorizing to the exclusion of all else -- in the classroom, in the evenings, at home, at cram school and in private tutoring sessions. Such a system once produced literate, obedient workers, reliable managers for predictable times -- but those somnambulistic days, thankfully, are over.
Competition has gone global. Asia may still be No. 1 in math and science, but in order to compete in the new international market, her children need to be more than just ace test-takers. Mere acquisition and retention of information won't make the grade today. One vital skill in which teachers in the Far East aren't imparting on their pupils: critical thinking. Today brains aren't enough. Asia's antiquated scholastic model needs to exercise brawn -- that certain ruggedness their counterparts in the US know so well.
While in Taipei, I spoke with peers educated in both the East and West. The problem with the Taiwanese, acknowledged my friend Russell Hsiao, who had spent time in the US, was that they weren't expected to think, just perceive. Among the young, bright and the native, there didn't appear to be the same level of intellectual banter or ideological sparring I'd come to expect on a US campus.
In the early 1990s, national reforms were implemented in Taiwan to make education more "well rounded." Encouraging participation in extracurricular activities sounded like a good idea, unfortunately, it only doubled the academic stress load. In addition to the prerequisites, students were required to check off additional items -- art, music, sports -- from their "to do" list. Reflecting the mental strain, depression and suicide rates rose among the young. In 2003, 55 students committed suicide, two years later the number nearly doubled. Just this March, the Ministry of Education requested students make "I Won't Commit Suicide" vows.
Sadly, Taiwan hasn't learned its lesson. In the US, school isn't just an institution for higher learning; it is a place for personal growth. The US teaches her minors the method of not just obtaining data, but acquiring knowledge. It's a wonderful thing that students in the US question their instructors and refuse to treat their textbooks as sacred text.
The result is a tough crowd to please, a public that's quick thinking and hot-blooded, filled with visionaries drumming up novel ideas and ingenious solutions. Surely that's something the US is doing right.
Holiday Dmitri is research editor at Radar Magazine in New York City.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations