Politicians tend to thrive on ambiguity as it keeps them out of the corner and can leave any issue open for a favorable interpretation. It is a comfort zone; a vantage point with plenty of escape routes should real issues and hard questions come their way.
Enter new UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon with a response last week to Taiwan's latest bid to join the UN. He states that Resolution 2758 "clearly mentions that the government of China is the sole and legitimate government." There is nothing new there. We frequently hear from all sides how China, at least, is recognized as a sole and legitimate government. However, he goes on to clarify that "the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China."
It really doesn't get any clearer than this. Regardless of all claims and counter-claims about the post-war status of Taiwan, and regardless of the ambiguous one China policy and its varied interpretations, and despite the content of Resolution 2758, the simple fact is that the UN considers Taiwan to be part of China.
This position completely flies in the face of reality; but then in terms of global economics and international conflict, the reality on the ground doesn't tend to be the UN's strong point.
But that aside, this is the situation facing Taiwan and it is no time to be running for the familiar comfort zones of "one China" policy interpretations.
All the letters in the world arguing about due process and the authority of the UN chief to reject Taiwan's application does little to confront the real issue and nothing to work toward a solution. This is the worst aspect of "comfort-zone politics."
UN membership is a worthwhile cause for Taiwan but in the grand scheme of things inroads need to be made in other areas first. Taiwan needs to raise its profile in cities and countries around Europe and the US, where most people could not distinguish between the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China.
With China suppressing the normal diplomatic routes, other avenues such as cultural and educational exchanges, tourism, literature and sports should be pursued to highlight the Taiwanese as a unique identity in Asia (development and promotion of Taiwan's overseas representative offices would be a good starting point). This does not, in fact should not, need to be presented in the context of Taiwanese independence from China. It is high time the rest of the world read or heard something about Taiwan without the usual affirmation or denunciation of links with China. It is an important point that many citizens of UN countries, in Europe in particular, have a very strong sense of national identity and a history of struggles for independence. Taiwan needs to tap into this sentiment. But it needs to do it in the right way.
The final point, upon which the previous is based, is that of nationalist sentiment here in Taiwan.
It is difficult both to garner and gauge nationalist sentiment in a country that is for all intents and purposes independent, and where the majority of its people is generally content with the current standards of living; there is nothing like poverty and violent suppression to bring out the raging nationalism in people.
But in order for Taiwan and its elected representatives to be taken seriously on the international stage, the type of partisan bickering that has dogged Taiwan for so long needs to be transcended by a unique sense of identity and belonging from one end of this island to the other. So that the next time the UN states it believes Taiwan to be part of China, it gets a clear and unambiguous answer from 23 million Taiwanese: "Well we don't!"
Anthony Lonergan
Taipei
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under