Another day, another record oil price, even if it didn't last long. This time nobody is surprised. The tone was set a few weeks ago when the International Energy Agency (IEA) warned of a supply "crunch" in five years' time and said demand for oil would grow at 2.2 percent a year, not 2 percent as previously thought, as India and China consume more.
Financial speculators enjoyed that assessment and increased their bets that the price would go higher. They were pushing at an open door. Crude oil stocks in the US have fallen, as if to demonstrate again that US consumers can't be separated from their cars even when their homes are plunging in value and pump prices are rising.
Meanwhile, the US hurricane season approaches, bringing a threat to production in the Gulf of Mexico; that's usually enough for a dollar or two on a barrel. Throw in a weak US dollar, the currency used to price oil, and the ingredients were there for a record price.
Behind it all, we are a witnessing a simple struggle by the oil majors and the OPEC cartel to keep up with demand. Producing oil is an exercise in heavy engineering, requiring huge infrastructure investment.
During the 1990s, when the oil price went as low as US$10 a barrel, spending was cut to the bone. The result is that everything -- rigs, tankers, geologists -- is still in short supply because this is an industry that thinks in terms of decades. On the demand side, the world has just enjoyed its strongest period of economic growth in decades, led by energy-hungry China.
Does it mean prices could go much higher? Not necessarily, because at some point sky-high prices will affect demand. But guessing where that point lies is a mug's game. The pundits with the best recent record are those at Goldman Sachs, who were the first to use the phrase "super spike." Their most recent forecast was that US$95 a barrel could be seen this winter; it was widely ridiculed at the time but suddenly looks plausible.
BANKING ON HBOS
This is what we want to see: Some serious directors dipping into their back pockets and buying shares. HBOS Plc chairman Lord Dennis Stevenson bought ?500,000 (US$1 million) worth of the bank's stock on Wednesday, while Peter Cummings, the head of the corporate bank, forked out ?100,000.
Chief executive Andy Hornby was excused the whip-round, but only because he spent ?250,000 a few months ago on HBOS shares.
NO DUMB LOANS
The trio would never put it this way, but their message to HBOS doubters in the City of London was clear: You may think our profits will fall over at the first hint of trouble in the mortgage market, but we don't; we're a diverse bank these days and we haven't made dumb loans.
The more usual way to signal confidence is to bump up shareholders' dividends, and HBOS did that too. The interim payment was lifted 23 percent and, again, the message was unmistakeable: HBOS is saying its earnings are of such quality that a higher level of dividends can be supported permanently.
It means that if, like Stevenson and Cummings, you were buying HBOS at ?9.27 on Wednesday, you can expect to collect 5.3 percent in income over the next year. That's not much less than you would get from a cash individual savings account, so why, if the shares are as cheap as the directors imply, did the price fall almost 3 percent on Wednesday?
Choppy market conditions is a glib answer, but it's hard to find a better one.
Yes, there are worries about the solidity of some of HBOS' income streams, especially the corporate bank, where pre-tax profits surged 54 percent to GBP1.24 billion, but Hornby was full of assurances that this performance was not a one-off.
HBOS, he said, has been careful to concentrate its lending to "old economy" companies, meaning those backed by solid assets, and the investment portfolio is diverse.
In the key area of mortgages, HBOS has regained market share after last year's misguided attempt to squeeze profit margins higher. That policy led to the first fall in retail profits for years, but the news on bad loans was extraordinary.
"We believe unsecured impairments have now peaked," HBOS said.
That's quite a statement, and an illustration of a striking feature in the past fortnight: many senior business figures are unworried by the woes in financial markets.
They think their balance sheets are strong enough to resist most storms.
PRUDENT CAPITAL RATIOS
That's hardly an outlandish boast: There is, after all, a world of difference between a leveraged hedge fund and a diversified high street bank with (we hope) prudent capital ratios.
We shall have to see what happens, but we know this: When directors who are already loaded up with options top up with direct purchases, you have to pay attention.
Sometimes they fool themselves with their confidence and fail to spot the approaching avalanche, but it's not usually the way to bet.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.