The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) was badly defeated in last Sunday's elections for Japan's upper house.
People have come to different conclusions about the reasons for this loss. Some believe that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was tired after dealing with the many scandals that have engulfed his government, and was unable to campaign well. Others say the problem was the scandal over pension fund records -- many Japanese worried that their retirement savings had been lost and people started to doubt the LPD's crisis management abilities.
Others believe that Abe's inability to maintain the reform policies of his predecessor Junichiro Koizumi, especially concerning consumption taxes, made people doubt his leadership abilities, and begin to believe that Koizumi had placed his confidence in the wrong person.
But I think the most important reason for the LDP's defeat was that Koizumi wasn't there.
Why do I say this? After all, under Abe Japan has experienced an economic growth rate of 2.2 percent, and an unemployment rate of 4 percent, an obvious improvement over Koizumi's tenure, when the growth rate was 1 percent and the unemployment rate 5.4 percent.
The ethical problems that have occurred in Abe's government are only minor when compared with the political scandals during Koizumi's era caused by Koichi Kato, Muneo Suzuki and others.
Lastly, the way Abe handled things when pension records were lost was much better than how Tsutumo Tabeke, the minister of agriculture under Koizumi, handled the problem of mad cow disease.
But the difference is that during Koizumi's time in office, he only needed to hoist the flag and shout slogans about making Japan a normal country, and as far as the Japanese were concerned, such minor problems were no longer an issue.
So why is it that the kind of problems that would have been seen as unimportant under Koizumi have pushed Abe's government close to the edge?
The most important reason is that the Japanese are tired of just hearing slogans about normalizing the country. They are like someone who was injured and then sedated, who only realizes how much they hurt after they wake up.
Abe is an excellent successor to Koizumi, and has faithfully continued his predecessor's policy of normalizing the country. But he is not Koizumi. He doesn't have Koizumi's charisma, and that's why even though he is continuing Koizumi's policies, Abe's support rate has been steadily plunging ever since he took office.
Another reason is that Abe is not deified by the Japanese people like Koizumi was. Abe first thought that to save the LDP he just needed to implement Koizumi's plans and ideas for normalizing the country, amend Article Nine of the Constitution and upgrade the Defense Agency to Ministry of Defense and the Self-Defense Forces to Self-Defense Army.
But he discovered that the Japanese didn't really pay attention to issues so far removed from their everyday life; they care more about their economic circumstances. Only then did Abe realize that Koizumi had attained a god-like status in the hearts of the Japanese, that it was not possible to replace him, and that it was not just his hair or his "Koizumi style" looks that made Koizumi who he was.
The final reason is that Japanese society tends to be very obedient to authority, where the collective good is more important than the individual. The country needs a politician with strong leadership and charisma to lead it. Even if such a leader only uses slogans, to the Japanese this slogan will seem like a huge lighthouse rising out of the sea to lead their ship through stormy waters.
Japanese tour groups are a good example of this need for a leader. The group has to have a tour leader with a flag in front of it. As soon as the tourists see a flag they know they can follow it, but those who don't see a flag don't know where to go.
Japanese prime ministers since World War II have all had an image of being very obedient to foreign powers, and few people would have expected a politician like Koizumi -- who did what he said he would -- to appear. Although Japan's relations with its neighbors fell to an all-time low in the six years Koizumi was in power, his foreign policy was one reason why he was so popular.
In the wake of the LDP's loss on Sunday, we are not worried about how much longer Abe's government can stay on or how long the LDP can remain in power. What we care about is where Japan will go without Koizumi.
Tsai Zheng-jia is an associate research fellow at the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.