The nation's wafer processing and manufacturing service industries have been the best in the world for a long time. When Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and United Microelectronics Corp (UMC) started mass producing 12-inch wafers, the US and European integrated chip (IC) industries were able to move away from manufacturing semiconductors themselves -- as integrated device manufacturers (IDM) -- to concentrate on design and sales.
Wafer manufacturing was left to TSMC and UMC and packaging and testing was also outsourced to Taiwanese companies such as ASE Group, Siliconware Precision Industries Co and Chipbond Corp. It is thanks to the large investments that the government made in the semiconductor manufacturing sector over the past 30 years that the industry can provide high-yield, high-quality manufacturing services and let the global semiconductor industry continue to enjoy double-digit growth.
In the beginning of 2002, the Ministry of Economic Affairs suddenly announced it was open to the possibility of eight-inch wafer manufacturers shifting their production to China. Fortunately, the Taiwan Association of University Professors, the Taiwanese Engineers' Association, the Taiwan Solidarity Union and other civic groups started a movement to stop this and TSMC and UMC production stayed in Taiwan for a while longer.
Only when the next generation of 12-inch wafers was brought into production were the companies allowed to move their eight-inch wafer fabs to China. In this way, Taiwan maintained its advantage.
But the ministry's willingness to allow older technology to move to China was not an effective management policy. Because the ministry was only thinking about manufacturers' demands, it nearly gave Taiwan's strategic industry away so China could copy it. Fortunately, the National Security Council (NSC) and the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) intervened, asking the National Science Council to write drafts of what would become the National Technology Protection Law (國家科技保護法) and the Regulations Governing Technology Professionals from the Taiwan Area Taking up Employment in the Mainland Area (台灣地區特定科技人員進入大陸地區任職許可辦法).
The NSC and MAC were thus able to delay wafer manufacturers from moving their production lines to China for five years. Thanks to government intervention, Taiwan has retained both its leading position in the industry and high-tech jobs.
Unlike the law-abiding TSMC, near the end of 2001, UMC invested in a partner company that then built a factory in Suzhou, China, to manufacture eight-inch wafers.
Note that it wasn't until the beginning of 2002 that the ministry said it might consider allowing wafer manufacturing to move to China. Last August, the president of China's Hejian Technology (Suzhou) gave UMC 15 percent of his company's stock. To UMC shareholders, this meant there finally was a clear transaction.
The ministry issued UMC an official warning and also fined the company NT$5 million (US$152,000), but suddenly and unexpectedly, on June 24 the Taipei High Administrative Court ruled that the ministry had not produced any clear evidence that UMC had broken the law and it then overturned the fine.
The ministry has been neglectful in its handling of the UMC's activities. The ministry kept putting off investigating this prime example of serious economic crime for many years. It did not handle the case well or provide proof that UMC had broken the law. This shows that the Democratic Progressive Party has been an absentee government as far as the high-tech industry goes.
This is a sad situation.
Was it really so difficult for the ministry to provide proof that the UMC board had invested in Hejian? Why did the Taipei High Administrative Court say the ministry had not produced any clear evidence, and overturned the fine?
The UMC board believed that it had made up for the UMC stockholders' losses when Hejian gave the company 15 percent of its shares. But how can the company's actions be justified to TSMC, which played by the rules all along when UMC did not?
A key component of Taiwan's industrial might was moved to China, bringing along its peripheral semiconductor industries such as packaging and testing services, materials and equipment industries.
UMC's investments in China have been a success. But for Taiwan, it has been a loss -- a loss of jobs and a loss of opportunities in the semiconductor industry.
Fining UMC NT$5 million does not make up for the losses to Taiwan.
The ministry has demonstrated its ineffectiveness. The court demonstrated that it had not dug deep enough into the relevant evidence when it decided to overturn the ministry's fine.
Such proceedings make law-abiding companies who kept their production in Taiwan feel sad and powerless.
Hsu Wen-fu is the vice president of the Taiwanese Engineers' Association.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry