In a prison cell south of Cairo a repentant Egyptian terrorist leader is putting the finishing touches on a remarkable recantation that undermines the Muslim theological basis for violent jihad and is set to generate furious controversy among former comrades still fighting with al-Qaeda.
Sayid Imam al-Sharif, 57, was the founder and first emir (commander) of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad organization, whose supporters assassinated president Anwar Sadat in 1981 and later teamed up with Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan in the war against the Soviet occupation.
Sharif, a surgeon who is still known by his underground name of "Dr Fadl," is famous as the author of the Salafi jihadists' "bible" -- Foundations of Preparation for Holy War. He worked with Ayman al-Zawahiri, another Egyptian doctor and now bin Laden's deputy, before being kidnapped in Yemen after Sept. 11, interrogated by the CIA and extradited to Egypt where he has been serving a life sentence since 2004.
Sharif recently gave an electrifying foretaste of his conversion by condemning killings on the basis of nationality and color of skin and the targeting of women and children, citing the Koran injunction: "Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress the limits; for God loveth not transgressors."
Armed operations were wrong, counterproductive and must cease, he declared sternly.
Zawahiri, evidently rattled, rounded sarcastically on him in a video message broadcast after Sharif's statement -- faxed from Torah prison to an Arabic newspaper -- announced not only his change of heart but a book-length repudiation endorsed by hundreds of other former militants, and which is due to be published soon.
"Do they now have fax machines in Egyptian jail cells?" Zawahiri asked. "I wonder if they're connected to the same line as the electric-shock machines [used to torture prisoners]," dismissing the exercise as propaganda warfare by Hosni Mubarak's security services.
But Egyptian and Western experts, government officials and former jihadis agree that Sharif's shift is both genuine and highly significant.
"People will say things to stop being tortured, but this is the result of a long process of reflection and debate," insists Muntasir al-Zayyat, a lawyer jailed for Islamic Jihad membership in the 1980s.
"When the book comes out there will be a furious reaction from Zawahiri and the global jihadi movement. It is clear that Sayid Imam will call a halt to killing operations in Egypt and abroad," he says.
Diaa Rashwan, of the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, says: "I have no doubt that this is genuine. It will be a real shock and cause a lot of confusion. Jihadis will see hundreds of their former brothers criticizing their most fundamental ideas. That's why Zawahiri is so bothered by it."
No one is predicting that the book will bring an end to suicide bombings in Iraq or Afghanistan. But interest is so intense that several Arabic newspapers are competing to buy the 100-page work, entitled Advice Regarding the Conduct of Jihadist Action in Egypt and the World.
Sharif's recantation has emerged from an Egyptian government counter-radicalization program which has successfully "converted" and rehabilitated members of the Gama'a Islamiyya (Islamic Group), once the largest jihadist organization in the Arab world, and which mounted countless armed attacks starting in the 1980s until calling a ceasefire after massacring 62 foreign tourists at Luxor in 1997.
Its top ideologues, mostly now freed, have written 25 volumes of revisions in a series called Tashih al-Mafahim (Corrections of Concepts). These tackle key doctrinal issues such as the concept of takfir -- declaring a Muslim an apostate and therefore permissible to kill; attacks on civilians and foreign tourists; and waging jihad against a Muslim ruler who does not apply sharia law.
"If you want to rob these people of their cover you have to take away their legitimacy," says Ashraf Mohsin, an Egyptian diplomat dealing with counter-terrorism.
"The way to deprive them of their ability to recruit is to attack the message. If you take Islam out of the message all that is left is criminality," he said.
Like the Gama'a before them, Sharif and other Jihad prisoners have been allowed by the interior ministry and state security to meet and consult each other in prison and have held religious dialogues with clerics from al-Azhar, the fount of mainstream jurisprudence in the Sunni world.
"Of course the Egyptian government is benefiting from this," Zayyat agrees.
"But it's not done for their benefit, or for the Americans," he says.
Past "revisions" have included apologies to the victims of terror attacks, recognition of them as "martyrs", and the annulment of fatwas as misguided.
But these are not an Islamist version of The God That Failed -- the 1949 anthology written by disillusioned communists -- but rather a reasoned rejection of theological misinterpretations. Their authors are neither secular nor liberal: Their self-criticism includes observations that the wrong path to jihad benefits only the Jews, the US and the Christian minority in Egypt.
"The Egyptian state is holding all this out as a huge triumph," a foreign diplomat says. "But the views these people preach are still pretty sinister. The state has to some extent accommodated itself to the Islamists."
Yet for Rashwan, Egypt's de-radicalization work has helped keep violence at bay.
The proof, he suggests, is that there has not been a jihadi incident in the Nile Valley since Luxor.
"Now this is a global phenomenon," says Rashwan, suggesting that an effort that emerged from Egypt's own security needs could provide lessons for others waging the battle for Muslim hearts and minds -- as relevant in Luton and Lyon as in Casablanca and Kabul.
"Security measures alone cannot defeat terrorism," argues Fouad Allam, a former state security general -- the guards outside his Cairo home testimony to decades spent hunting down armed Islamists.
"Terrorism has to be fought with a broader strategy in which the political issues that fuel extremism are dealt with so that these sort of `revisions' will have some effect," Allam says.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas