The government announced last Wednesday it would offer fuel subsidies to public transport operators to prevent inflation while encouraging people to use mass transportation systems.
Under the government's plan, the state-run CPC Corp, Taiwan (CPC) agreed to provide buses with a subsidy of NT$3 per liter of diesel and taxis NT$2 per liter of gasoline.
The company said it would stop the subsidies when fuel prices drop or if taxis or buses hiked fares.
But this leads to a tricky question: Should taxis be treated as part of the public transportation system?
The privately run Formosa Petrochemical Corp seemed more cunning than CPC when it instead offered a fuel subsidy of NT$3 per liter to bus operators on Thursday, but not the NT$2 per liter subsidy for taxis.
Apparently policy makers view taxis as a part of the public transportation system.
Some people disagree, saying a public transportation system refers to rail and bus services, or ferries in certain regions. They say services like taxis usually depend on a vehicle with no more than four seats, driver excluded.
Therefore, from an energy conservation perspective, taxis require more rides and energy than other forms of mass transportation.
The fuel subsidies also beg the question of fairness. Every time CPC announces plans to raise fuel prices, it justifies them by saying that it isn't fair to ask taxpayers to subsidize motorists.
But is it now reasonable for some taxpayers who cannot afford -- or prefer not to take -- taxis to bear the price burden for other better-off taxpayers who do use the service?
Taiwan imports more than 98 percent of its energy, and the public feels the financial pinch whenever energy prices rise. So far this year, domestic gas prices have increased by NT$3 per liter or 8.6 percent on average, CPC data shows.
To ease public worries about rising prices, the government has initiated several measures. But it is unclear whether the government wanted to make inflation or energy conservation the top priority when it announced the subsidies.
If the government hopes to help people conserve energy, is it better to offer biodiesel subsidies to all motorists -- in a bid to promote renewable energy and reduce greenhouse emissions -- than provide gasoline subsidies to taxi drivers?
Finally, there is still the question of whether politics played a role in the fuel subsidies as it has in other economic policies. Were the government's actions meant to win over voters ahead of legislative and presidential elections?
To reflect the real cost, the government has reiterated its determination to continue the floating fuel pricing mechanism, in which the CPC has, since September, linked domestic fuel prices to benchmark crude oil prices in New York.
As a result, there is only one question left about fuel subsidies: Does the government want the market mechanism to prevail?
Unfortunately, policy makers have moved in the opposite direction. The government didn't offer a long-term strategy to increase public confidence in transportation prices. Instead it dished out perks only a few people would appreciate.
If fuel subsidy measures are only introduced to build support for the ruling government, they do not serve the interests of the nation as a whole.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.