The government announced last Wednesday it would offer fuel subsidies to public transport operators to prevent inflation while encouraging people to use mass transportation systems.
Under the government's plan, the state-run CPC Corp, Taiwan (CPC) agreed to provide buses with a subsidy of NT$3 per liter of diesel and taxis NT$2 per liter of gasoline.
The company said it would stop the subsidies when fuel prices drop or if taxis or buses hiked fares.
But this leads to a tricky question: Should taxis be treated as part of the public transportation system?
The privately run Formosa Petrochemical Corp seemed more cunning than CPC when it instead offered a fuel subsidy of NT$3 per liter to bus operators on Thursday, but not the NT$2 per liter subsidy for taxis.
Apparently policy makers view taxis as a part of the public transportation system.
Some people disagree, saying a public transportation system refers to rail and bus services, or ferries in certain regions. They say services like taxis usually depend on a vehicle with no more than four seats, driver excluded.
Therefore, from an energy conservation perspective, taxis require more rides and energy than other forms of mass transportation.
The fuel subsidies also beg the question of fairness. Every time CPC announces plans to raise fuel prices, it justifies them by saying that it isn't fair to ask taxpayers to subsidize motorists.
But is it now reasonable for some taxpayers who cannot afford -- or prefer not to take -- taxis to bear the price burden for other better-off taxpayers who do use the service?
Taiwan imports more than 98 percent of its energy, and the public feels the financial pinch whenever energy prices rise. So far this year, domestic gas prices have increased by NT$3 per liter or 8.6 percent on average, CPC data shows.
To ease public worries about rising prices, the government has initiated several measures. But it is unclear whether the government wanted to make inflation or energy conservation the top priority when it announced the subsidies.
If the government hopes to help people conserve energy, is it better to offer biodiesel subsidies to all motorists -- in a bid to promote renewable energy and reduce greenhouse emissions -- than provide gasoline subsidies to taxi drivers?
Finally, there is still the question of whether politics played a role in the fuel subsidies as it has in other economic policies. Were the government's actions meant to win over voters ahead of legislative and presidential elections?
To reflect the real cost, the government has reiterated its determination to continue the floating fuel pricing mechanism, in which the CPC has, since September, linked domestic fuel prices to benchmark crude oil prices in New York.
As a result, there is only one question left about fuel subsidies: Does the government want the market mechanism to prevail?
Unfortunately, policy makers have moved in the opposite direction. The government didn't offer a long-term strategy to increase public confidence in transportation prices. Instead it dished out perks only a few people would appreciate.
If fuel subsidy measures are only introduced to build support for the ruling government, they do not serve the interests of the nation as a whole.
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked. The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport
As the COVID-19 pandemic spins out of control, many parts of the world are experiencing shortages of medical masks and other protective equipment. I am studying in Washington state, which at the time of writing is the US state that has suffered the largest number of deaths from the novel coronavirus. The week before last, UW Medicine — an organization that includes the University of Washington School of Medicine and associated medical centers and clinics — sent its volunteers an e-mail asking the public to make masks and donate them to hospitals. Attached to the message was a mask donation