Since its launch earlier this month, the Maokong Gondola has become one long headache for Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
The signs were bad from day one, when shortly after the grand opening an embarrassed Hau and predecessor Ma Ying-jeou (
Following its inauspicious opening, the system has been hurt by a catalog of problems, including a lightning strike that caused a five-hour shutdown and last Saturday's breakdown that left passengers cooking for up to two hours in the cars as Taipei sweltered through its hottest July day in more than 80 years.
All major infrastructure projects suffer from teething problems, but aside from the technical difficulties, more worrying things were overlooked or ignored during the planning, construction and commissioning of the system.
Anyone who has sat for just 30 seconds in an automobile without air-conditioning on a hot summer's day in this country knows how naive those who chose the gondola design must have been to omit this necessity.
Air conditioning and proper ventilation of the cabins should have been the first priority.
Even more interesting is the emergence of news that the system was opened to the public before its "final acceptance," or the point where the manufacturer's guarantee period comes into effect.
The New Construction Department fast-tracked the project as a "major transportation facility," originally hoping to finish it before Ma left office in February, enabling him to add another star to his municipal report card, but the cable car's manufacturers would not allow it to shorten the system's test-run period.
This suggests that in its haste to get the system operating, the city government rushed things -- and may have cut corners -- while using the paying public as guinea pigs.
This theory was lent credibility by city government Secretariat Deputy Director Yang Hsi-an (
The decision to halt operations each Monday proves that the city government was too hasty in its efforts to get the system up and running.
The project was all but complete before Hau became mayor and so he cannot be held completely responsible for the situation. Nevertheless, Hau decided to stick with most of Ma's backroom staff when he assumed office, meaning that many of the people responsible for the cable car project remain in their well-paid jobs despite the stupidity that has ensued.
Hau can guarantee the safety of the system as often as he likes, but he cannot guarantee that more mishaps -- possibly serious -- will not occur.
Thankfully, no one has been injured. But there comes a point where someone must take responsibility for the fact that members of the public were exposed to unnecessary danger. The New Construction Department might be a good place to start.
As things stand, the flyers posted around the city promoting the cable car as "a new experience" remain accurate. One can only assume that the current shambles is not the kind of experience that the city government was hoping for.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations