In floppy hats and gumboots, Kenya's Kikuyu farmers are preparing for war with Britain. There isn't an AK-47 in sight, though there are plenty of organic cucumbers, carrots, French beans and cauliflowers.
It's a battle over who is to blame for climate change -- poor African farmers who export their produce by air, or Western consumers who care about the environmental impact of "food miles."
"Who emits more greenhouse gases?" asks Charles Kimani among his avocado trees. "A Kenyan or a Briton?"
The average Briton emits 30 times more carbon than a Kenyan, according to World Bank figures -- or 9.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide compared with 0.3 tonnes.
Behind the furore is the proposal by the UK's Soil Association (SA), which campaigns for organic food, organic farming and sustainable forestry to ban imports of organic produce from poor countries like Kenya because of their "food miles" -- the carbon emitted by air transport.
The SA will hear views on the issue until September, when it may decide to introduce a limited or total ban.
A ban would mean labeling air-freighted products so that they effectively lost their organic status due to their food miles.
Such a move would destroy the livelihoods of tens of thousands of smallholders across Africa in one of the continent's most enterprising export industries, forcing them back into poverty and subsistence farming.
"A ban on our export market will be death for us," says Kimani, who has put his children through school and college from the profits made from his fruit and vegetables on just three hectares of land.
Organic produce is the fastest growth area of Africa's horticultural industry, together with cut flowers and other high-value products like dried herbs and essential oils. In Kenya, where two-thirds of people live on less than US$1 a day, horticulture is the largest export after tourism. The story is much the same in Ethiopia, Uganda and Tanzania.
A chain of other industries from packaging to transport firms also rely on horticulture, so the knock-on effect would hurt millions of jobs across the region.
The food miles debate deepens the scepticism that many Africans already have towards Western rhetoric about ending poverty in the continent. Most farmers in upcountry Kenyan areas such as Kiambu do not look to increased aid as the way out of poverty. Devout Christians with a tradition of hard work and self-help, Kikuyu farmers see wealth coming from access to lucrative Western markets.
"The SA proposal is just another non-tariff barrier to trade among the many that already exist," says Eustace Kiarii, chief of an organization representing Kenyan organic farmers.
"Over the years we have developed an enterprising culture that should not be undermined. Farmers from Kenya and developing countries are not asking for special trade access, but to be allowed to trade competitively," he said.
Kenyan organic farmers receive not a cent in subsidies, whereas EU farmers enjoyed some 50 billion euros in aid last year.
Kenyans also point out that the SA proposals -- backed by UK farmers and environmentalists -- are not yet based on accurate scientific data.
A taskforce in Nairobi has commissioned a study hoping to prove the food miles lobby wrong by looking at African farming in comparison to European organic agriculture.
The food miles lobby argues that air-freighting food emits more carbon dioxide than any other method of transportation.
To fly 1kg of mangetout from Nairobi to London takes 4kg of carbon.
London's Cranfield University calculated in a recent study that growing roses in Kenya -- which relies heavily on renewable energies such as solar or thermal power -- and air-freighting them to Europe saved more carbon than if the flowers were grown in Holland with its high energy costs and cold climate.
Local farmers have to work hard to gain organic certification and access to the European organic market is a long and complicated affair.
Mureithi Simba and his group of 20 smallholders at Sagana, on the verdant slopes of Mount Kenya, have been attempting to improve their farming methods to qualify as organic exporters since 2001.
"For five years, we have been working on improvement of standards for certification by the SA," Simba said.
"We were waiting for the SA experts to come here to verify us. If SA bans the air-freighting of our produce to the UK market, then it will have killed our effort," he said. "We will have wasted our five years, energy and the resources we have already invested in it."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations