Environmentalists in Myanmar have expressed their shock at seeing mountains of logs being transported on trucks across the border into China despite efforts to halt the trade to save the country's forests from total destruction.
"I was shocked to see mountains of logs and big timber trucks" heading from Laiza into China, the spokeswoman for one local environment group, the Pan Kachin Development Society said.
On condition that she not be named, she said she had counted up to 80 trucks crossing the border each day during a visit to the town in April.
Stacks of teak, tamalan and other woods lined the roads waiting to go, she said.
"It seems they have set up sawmills in the forest and chopped the trees to be easier to carry," she said. "Some logs were only about one-and-a-half feet [0.45m] in circumference," although China usually wants trees nearly twice that size.
"That means that people even cut small trees because there are no more big trees left," she said.
The trade endures despite China's efforts to stop it because of a complex mix of interests.
For Myanmar's junta, timber is one of its major sources of desperately needed foreign currency.
MyanmarTwo main ethnic Kachin groups who have partial control over the region also see the timber trade as a key source of income and have shown varying degrees of willingness to stop it.
LAX ENFORCEMENT
Local Chinese authorities along the border have not consistently enforced the year-old ban, creating pockets where timber still flows across the border.
Laiza, a village about 1,000km north of Yangon, is the base for the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), one of 17 armed ethnic groups to have signed ceasefires with Myanmar's military junta.
After the KIO signed its ceasefire in 1993, the group received a degree of autonomy in their part of Kachin State, a region sandwiched between China and India that is home to virgin forests as well as jade, gold and other mineral reserves.
Laiza quickly turned into a significant trading town, especially for timber which once flowed freely across the border about 16km away to feed China's insatiable appetite for raw materials.
HUGE APPETITE
Some 1.5 million cubic meters of timber worth US$350 million was exported from Myanmar to China in 2005, most of it illegal, according to Britain-based forestry watchdog Global Witness.
That was a 12 percent gain over the amount of timber shipped to China the year before, and roughly double the amount exported in 2000, Global Witness said.
China, which has imposed stiff limits on logging in its own forests amid fears of deforestation, uses the wood to supply its construction boom and its soaring exports of wooden furniture.
But in the face of international pressure that followed the Global Witness report, China decided a year ago to officially close its borders to Myanmar's timber.
Global Witness said one of its teams spent a couple of weeks on the border in April, and they believed the ban has had a major effect on the Chinese side, although some problems remain.
"What we are seeing from the Chinese side is there has been a ban in all areas along the border, no question about it," said Mike Davis, Global Witness team leader for the Southeast Asia forest campaign.
With scant data from Myanmar's government, environmental groups analyze Chinese import and logging data to estimate the size of the trade, but no precise data has been made available since the ban took effect last year.
But to illustrate the ban's overall effectiveness, Davis pointed to the town of Pianma, a major border timber town.
Migrant workers flocked to the city a decade ago when the illegal trade turned it into a boom town, driving its population from 3,000 to about 40,000.
Since last year, Davis said the town was down to 10,000 people as migrant workers found the logging business drying up.
"That said, there is stuff still coming across in various places, and in some places at times in quite large volume," he said.
"We are concerned, I think these types of activity are on the increase," he said.
SUPPORT UNDERMINED
At the government level China appeared to be genuinely working at shutting down the illicit trade, Davis said, but he added that those efforts had been hampered by Chinese companies fiddling with their quotas or hunting for loopholes in the ban.
Some of the trade is just plain smuggling, he said.
"Chinese businesses involved in the trade are increasingly choosing to buy pieces of forested land within Kachin State in order to clear-fell all tree cover," Davis said.
"This is a particularly destructive approach to logging that causes huge environmental damage," he said.
Clear-cutting in Myanmar's interior also makes it difficult to estimate the extent of the deforestation because outsiders have so little access to the area.
But Global Witness says huge swathes of land along the border have been logged.
One former military man who was involved in the trade in Myanmar said that logging was still possible if big enough bribes were paid to local police, forestry officials, military personnel and local militia groups.
"If we got a logging permit for 10 tonnes from an official, we would cut at least 30 tonnes of trees just from that permit paper," the former military source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
BRIBERY
He said he had left the armed services after the pro-democracy uprising in 1988, and like many other former soldiers ended up taking a job in logging where he used his military connections to facilitate the passing of bribes from companies to the government.
He believes his company made a lot of money, but says that wealth didn't trickle down. He finally quit the business in 2000 because he was fed up with the corrupt system.
Sometimes, he said, he had received permits to log in areas that had already been clearcut.
"What we did then, we'd just find a place where there were still trees and cut them down," he said.
Despite the concern about the future of the Myanmar forests, Davis said he believes the Chinese authorities had managed to significantly curb the trade, in part because they wanted to avoid negative publicity ahead of next year's Beijing Olympics.
"We think that although the restrictions that the Chinese imposed are not an end solution in themselves, they are an encouraging start," he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under