Despite the international community's considerable efforts in Afghanistan since 2001 to eliminate the Taliban and al-Qaeda, the insurgency in the south of the country has gathered momentum at breakneck speed in recent months. Our field research shows that we are not winning the campaign for the hearts and minds of the Afghan people -- the Taliban are. Indeed, the international community's methods of fighting the insurgency and eradicating poppy crops have actually helped the insurgents gain power.
The international community has so far pursued policies of destruction, rather than the promised reconstruction.
The aggressive US-led counter-narcotics policy of crop eradication has failed to win the support of Afghans because it has triggered a chain reaction of poverty and violence in which poor farmers, with their only livelihood destroyed, are unable to feed their families. This has been exacerbated by the failure to provide even the most basic aid and development to the country's poorest areas.
At the same time, communities have been torn apart as a result of bombing campaigns that have destroyed the very homes we came to protect. This, in addition to four years of drought, has forced entire families to leave their villages for makeshift refugee camps.
The Taliban have exploited the failures of the international community with extremely effective anti-Western propaganda that has fueled significant doubt in the minds of the public concerning the reasons behind the international presence in Afghanistan. Sadly, our troops are often the first to pay the price.
It is not too late to win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people. International troops are excelling in an exceptionally hostile environment, but this is not a war that will be won by military alone.
With public perception a crucial factor in winning the war and the Taliban poised to launch a large military initiative next spring, failure to adopt a successful local strategy could signify the last chance the international community will have to build a secure and stable Afghanistan.
But a successful strategy -- one that responds to Afghanistan's extreme poverty crisis -- requires that the international community reverse course on crop eradication. In fact, the eradication of poppy crops not only damages local communities and undermines the international community's goals, but is also failing: opium production last year was at an all-time high. In September, the UN Office on Drugs Crime announced that poppy cultivation soared by a record-high 60 percent.
Eradication will never be successful in Afghanistan because it destroys the single crop that will grow in the south's harsh climate and thus serves as the main source of income to millions of people. So a new, long-term, economically sustainable solution is urgently needed -- one that directly engages with the communities that are suffering most -- in order to achieve the support of the deeply impoverished rural population.
As a way to address this dilemma, the Senlis Council is proposing to run scientific pilot projects to research an opium licensing system for Afghanistan, which would be a core component of the economic reconstruction process. A system in which poppy is cultivated under license for the production of pain-killing medicines such as morphine and codeine would allow farmers to pursue their traditional livelihood and way of life and, more importantly, to feed themselves and their families.
There is a global shortage of morphine and codeine, particularly in underdeveloped countries, where these vital medicines are often in short supply, if not completely unavailable.
Not only would poppy licensing address the poverty and hunger crises that have engulfed the south of Afghanistan; it also would stabilize existing local structures, giving communities a reason to support President Hamid Karzai's government and the international community. Farmers would gain a sense of ownership in counter-narcotics efforts, in sharp contrast to the current idealistic -- and evidently unachievable -- policy of crop eradication.
We must have the backing of the Afghan people if we are to defeat the Taliban. By endorsing such an initiative, the international community would demonstrate that it is in Afghanistan for the good of the local population, which would help farmers sever ties with the insurgency.
But for such a system to be successful, the extreme poverty in the south of the country must first be our top priority. According to the World Food Program, 70 percent of the population lacks food security. An immediate injection of emergency food and medical aid is urgently needed to break the vicious circle of suffering and violence.
Only then could a new, long-term development strategy in Afghanistan -- one that admits that the international community is not winning the war and that the current situation is unacceptable -- be implemented. Licensing opium crops would be a realistic and pragmatic cornerstone of that strategy's success.
Raymond Kendall is a former secretary-general of Interpol and Norine MacDonald QC is the Founding President of the Senlis Council, a security and development think tank
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under