The Western media have a habit of going on feeding frenzies. Ironically, when it comes to China, the latest frenzy concerns food itself.
The execution this week of the former head of China's State Food and Drug Administration, (SFDA) Zheng Xiaoyu (
First came a spate of stories about pet food laced with melamine (a coal derivative), cough medicine and toothpaste adulterated with diethylene glycol (a sweet-tasting industrial chemical used in anti-freeze and brake fluid), toy trains decorated with lead-based paints, bacteria-infected antibiotics, exploding cellphone batteries and defective car tires.
Attention has now turned to food. The world press is filled with stories about honey laced with industrial sweeteners, canned goods contaminated by bacteria and excessive amounts of additives, rice wine braced with industrial alcohol and farm-raised fish, eel and shrimp fed large doses of antibiotics and then washed down with formaldehyde to lower bacterial counts.
In response, the Chinese government acted almost instantly. The General Administration of Quality and Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine conducted a survey and reported that nearly one-fifth of all products made in China for domestic use did not measure up to safety and quality standards.
At the same time, regulators increased inspections, closed down some 180 food manufacturers and now post the names of violators on their Web site.
Moreover, not only was Zheng executed, but Cao Wenzhuang (
But why does this surprise us? After all, "capitalism with Chinese characteristics" has been a chaotic free-for-all for some time. Roughly 75 percent of China's food is now produced by small, private and unlicensed operations that are difficult to regulate.
With little knowledge of China's tectonic changes, foreigners have been investing, buying, trading and extravagantly praising its amazing, but hell-bent, "economic boom." Fear of "China bashing" has made it difficult for so-called "friends of China" to discuss its darker side openly.
The Chinese people themselves, however, have been far from unaware that the purity of their food, medicine, water and air is in doubt. The back-alley news has long been replete with rumors of things going awry. One small-time operation ground up sheet-rock and put it in gel caps to sell as medicine.
A peasant village raided a hospital dumpster to reclaim discarded surgical equipment, wash it in a nearby canal, repackage it in sealed plastic saying "sterilized," and sell it back to the hospital at cut-rate prices.
It has not helped, of course, that the Chinese Communist Party loathes a free press and a robust civil society -- both of which are essential information feedback loops in ensuring any country's well-being.
Nor has it helped that China's regulatory agencies lag far behind the growth of its economy.
For example, the Beijing office of China's State Environmental Protection Administration has less than 300 employees, whereas the US Environmental Protection Agency has more than 17,000.
China's mad rush toward wealth and power has given it little chance to develop all the compensatory institutions that any truly developed, not to say enlightened, society needs to achieve equilibrium and social health.
But in today's globalized world, where national boundaries have morphed into synapses for a myriad of uncontrollable interactions, each country's problems have become everyone's problem.
So, before we in the West become too censorious of China's quality control problems, we should remember our complicity in making China the world's industrial park and global dumping ground for many toxic industries.
While we may lament the loss of manufacturing jobs through "outsourcing," we certainly do not lament exporting massive amounts of pollution to China.
China may come to rue the wanton eagerness with which it has embraced industrialization. Already, the Chinese are beginning to awaken from the infatuation with development that besieged them as they began to emerge from the commodity-starved Cultural Revolution. In a world of scarcity, more always seemed better.
But now, just as the West began to understand decades ago that the natural environment has limits, China is showing the first signs of entering a post-industrial phase.
So, rather than simply shutting our doors to Chinese products, we might contemplate helping China by opening the doors of our regulatory agencies to Chinese regulators.
To do so would actually help ourselves. For, even with "strategic competitors" like China, we now live in a global commons in which we share air, water, manufactured goods and even food.
Orville Schell is the Arthur Ross Director of the Asia Society's Center on US-China Relations.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs