The Western media have a habit of going on feeding frenzies. Ironically, when it comes to China, the latest frenzy concerns food itself.
The execution this week of the former head of China's State Food and Drug Administration, (SFDA) Zheng Xiaoyu (
First came a spate of stories about pet food laced with melamine (a coal derivative), cough medicine and toothpaste adulterated with diethylene glycol (a sweet-tasting industrial chemical used in anti-freeze and brake fluid), toy trains decorated with lead-based paints, bacteria-infected antibiotics, exploding cellphone batteries and defective car tires.
Attention has now turned to food. The world press is filled with stories about honey laced with industrial sweeteners, canned goods contaminated by bacteria and excessive amounts of additives, rice wine braced with industrial alcohol and farm-raised fish, eel and shrimp fed large doses of antibiotics and then washed down with formaldehyde to lower bacterial counts.
In response, the Chinese government acted almost instantly. The General Administration of Quality and Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine conducted a survey and reported that nearly one-fifth of all products made in China for domestic use did not measure up to safety and quality standards.
At the same time, regulators increased inspections, closed down some 180 food manufacturers and now post the names of violators on their Web site.
Moreover, not only was Zheng executed, but Cao Wenzhuang (
But why does this surprise us? After all, "capitalism with Chinese characteristics" has been a chaotic free-for-all for some time. Roughly 75 percent of China's food is now produced by small, private and unlicensed operations that are difficult to regulate.
With little knowledge of China's tectonic changes, foreigners have been investing, buying, trading and extravagantly praising its amazing, but hell-bent, "economic boom." Fear of "China bashing" has made it difficult for so-called "friends of China" to discuss its darker side openly.
The Chinese people themselves, however, have been far from unaware that the purity of their food, medicine, water and air is in doubt. The back-alley news has long been replete with rumors of things going awry. One small-time operation ground up sheet-rock and put it in gel caps to sell as medicine.
A peasant village raided a hospital dumpster to reclaim discarded surgical equipment, wash it in a nearby canal, repackage it in sealed plastic saying "sterilized," and sell it back to the hospital at cut-rate prices.
It has not helped, of course, that the Chinese Communist Party loathes a free press and a robust civil society -- both of which are essential information feedback loops in ensuring any country's well-being.
Nor has it helped that China's regulatory agencies lag far behind the growth of its economy.
For example, the Beijing office of China's State Environmental Protection Administration has less than 300 employees, whereas the US Environmental Protection Agency has more than 17,000.
China's mad rush toward wealth and power has given it little chance to develop all the compensatory institutions that any truly developed, not to say enlightened, society needs to achieve equilibrium and social health.
But in today's globalized world, where national boundaries have morphed into synapses for a myriad of uncontrollable interactions, each country's problems have become everyone's problem.
So, before we in the West become too censorious of China's quality control problems, we should remember our complicity in making China the world's industrial park and global dumping ground for many toxic industries.
While we may lament the loss of manufacturing jobs through "outsourcing," we certainly do not lament exporting massive amounts of pollution to China.
China may come to rue the wanton eagerness with which it has embraced industrialization. Already, the Chinese are beginning to awaken from the infatuation with development that besieged them as they began to emerge from the commodity-starved Cultural Revolution. In a world of scarcity, more always seemed better.
But now, just as the West began to understand decades ago that the natural environment has limits, China is showing the first signs of entering a post-industrial phase.
So, rather than simply shutting our doors to Chinese products, we might contemplate helping China by opening the doors of our regulatory agencies to Chinese regulators.
To do so would actually help ourselves. For, even with "strategic competitors" like China, we now live in a global commons in which we share air, water, manufactured goods and even food.
Orville Schell is the Arthur Ross Director of the Asia Society's Center on US-China Relations.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.