uch of the US' dominance in world finance comes from the dollar's status as international money. The US' commitment to free capital markets, the rule of law and price stability confer credibility on the dollar as a store of value. But US spending habits have undermined the dollar's reputation, with the excess supply of dollars on world markets depressing its price.
This spring, the euro's exchange rate against the dollar reached an all-time high, and central banks have increased the euro share of their international reserves. Is the dollar about to lose the crown of world finance to the euro?
History suggests otherwise, despite a vulnerable dollar.
US financial supremacy in the 21st century resembles the UK's position in world finance a century ago. Before the outbreak of World War I in August 1914, the pound served as the currency of choice for international transactions, just as the dollar does today, and the world's borrowers visited the City of London to raise capital.
British economist John Maynard Keynes worried that countries would not use sterling to settle trading balances with each other if the pound were not viewed as a reliable store of value.
The "future position of the City of London," according to Keynes, depended on the pound sterling continuing to serve the business world as the equivalent of gold. The UK maintained the pound's convertibility into gold at the outbreak of the Great War to preserve its credibility as the international medium of exchange.
The dollar could not challenge sterling's role as the world's currency without matching its reputation. August 1914 provided the opportunity. The biggest gold outflow in a generation imperiled the US' ability to repay its debts abroad. Fear that the US would abandon the gold standard sent the dollar plummeting on world markets.
But the Secretary of the Treasury William McAdoo firmly secured US financial honor in August 1914 by remaining true to gold while everyone else, except for the British, abandoned their obligations. Despite the dollar's instant credibility, however, it took more than a decade for the US' currency to match Britain's as an international medium of exchange. Payment habits melt at a glacier's pace.
Britain's transformation from international creditor to international debtor during the Great War gave the dollar a second wind in its battle with sterling. The British were forced to abandon gold convertibility in April 1919 -- a tactical withdrawal intended to pave the way for Britain's return to the former 4.8665 parity with the US dollar. Six years later, in April 1925, Britain confirmed its monetary credibility and returned to the gold standard. But the pound had already suffered irreparable damage.
The experience of 1914 implies that a credible alternative can replace an entrenched world currency, especially after an unfavorable balance of trade has weakened it.
But even then, dethroning the reigning king of international exchange takes time.
Today, the euro -- a currency without a country -- lacks a long track record of credibility. Thirteen countries in the EU use the euro as money. But the commitment of these independent political entities to the euro cannot match the history of the US' commitment to the dollar.
The European Central Bank (ECB), established in 1998, has a mandate to manage the new currency to maintain price stability. But the ECB needs time to establish its inflation-fighting credentials. It cannot hitch a ride on gold, the way the US did a century ago. So the euro must earn its reputation crisis by crisis to confront the dollar's dominance as the currency of choice for international transactions.
Recent experience with the euro as an official reserve asset is instructive. Between 2000 and 2005, the dollar lost more than 25 percent of its value against the euro. Meanwhile, the fraction of international reserves held in euros grew from 18 percent to 24 percent, and the dollar's share dropped from 71 percent to 66 percent. In short, the euro has clearly made some headway during this period of US balance of payment deficits, but this reflects an evolutionary decline in the dollar's dominance, not a revolutionary regime shift.
What might trigger a fatal run on the dollar in world markets? While a broad and abrupt sell-off of dollars by major holders -- for example, China -- appears unlikely, a cataclysmic event, similar to the outbreak of the Great War in 1914, could prompt a search for a new international medium of exchange. In the modern era of automated payments, the upheaval might come from a terrorist attack that undermines the computerized transfer facilities of the world's banking system. A catastrophic loss of electronic records could surely destroy the credibility of the dollar as the international medium of exchange.
But exactly what would replace the dollar under such circumstances remains an open question.
After all, a loss of computer records would make the euro equally suspect. Its possible that gold, a store of value impervious to physical distortion, could make a comeback. Of course, one can only hope that such a scenario remains pure conjecture.
William Silber is professor of finance and economics at New York University's Stern School of Business Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.