President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) wants to hold a referendum on whether Taiwan should apply to join the UN under the name "Taiwan." There is no doubt that the referendum would show that most Taiwanese support the idea.
But it doesn't matter if public opinion across the globe supports such a bid because there is no legal basis for the use of the name "Taiwan" that would let the UN or other organizations accept that name.
The majority of Taiwanese would like our nation to join the UN using the name that we all cherish, "Taiwan" or the "Republic of Taiwan." But when it comes right down to it, the name of our country is not "Taiwan" in the Constitution. The name according to the Constitution is the "Republic of China" (ROC). Until we change our country's name, how can we ask other states to recognize us and accept us into organizations under that name?
Of course, the real reason Taiwan cannot join the UN is China's objection. But China is not the only problem. Our inability to obtain a sufficient number of votes from UN member states isn't the only problem either. There is not sufficient legal basis for a "Taiwan" bid.
Ever since the ROC regime pulled out of the UN in protest at China's admission to the UN in 1971, the ROC's diplomatic space has steadily decreased.
It would be ridiculous for us to use the name "ROC" internally, but "Taiwan" externally.
A powerful, meaningful and necessary step is to demonstrate that "Taiwan" is our country's name.
The people of Taiwan must express their desire through a democratic referendum or other legal means that can demonstrate our view that we are Taiwan.
With that done, laws and the Constitution can be amended to change our name. This way we might succeed in winning enough international support for our country's name and our country's right to representation within the UN.
In conclusion, the obstacle is not just that China is blocking us, and not just that there is no sufficient support abroad for the issue.
The problem is that we must first change the name of our country to "Taiwan."
Making that change could persuade other states to support us.
Lee Yen-mou
Lujhou, Taipei County
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs