To follow up Gerrit van der Wees' excellent account ("Taiwan is as much a nation-state as the US," June 18, page 8), may I propose the following thought experiment?
Suppose a Martian visited Taiwan and I asked him if it was a nation state?
I suspect he would say: "Well, it has a self-identified population, clearly defined territory, a flag, a national anthem, substantial military forces, regular elections, a long history, a legal system, a president, a police force and so forth.
"When I landed one of their officials stamped my passport. So if the phrase `nation state' means anything, then Taiwan is certainly a nation state."
I would then explain that, according to many countries, Taiwan is not. Why? Because China says it is not. If China recognized that Taiwan was a state, then the rest of the world would agree. So evidently China has the power to decide if Taiwan is a nation state.
My question is this: Does China have this power only with respect to Taiwan? Or do we have to check with China if other places are in fact nation states? Mongolia, for example? Or Canada (which was part of undivided British North America)?
If the answer is "yes," but only with respect to Taiwan, then the question that follows is why is there such a limitation? If "no," and China turns out to be the ultimate arbiter of statehood, then international law will be in for some substantial revision.
Lauder Professor of International Relations
University of Pennsylvania
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
There have been media reports that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) plans to hold military exercises in August to simulate seizing the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. In the past, only Coast Guard Administration (CGA) personnel have been stationed there, but the Ministry of National Defense has dispatched the Republic of China Marine Corps to the islands, nominally for “ex-situ training,” to prevent a Chinese attack under the guise of military drills. The move is only a temporary measure and not sufficiently proactive. Instead, the government should officially declare sovereignty over the islands and station troops
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement