Ahead of next year's presidential elections, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Frank Hsieh (
Looking at all this from the perspective of the nation's Aboriginal peoples, both political parties only care about political power, and there is nothing new in their ideas on a future "new Taiwan."
During the 2000 presidential election campaign, Chen Shui-bian (
For example, a Tsou tribal leader and his son who confiscated honey collected by a Han Chinese man on Aboriginal land in 2003 were prosecuted and convicted. More recently, attempts by Aborigines to safeguard the waters near Orchid Island (蘭嶼) from large-scale fishing by non-Aboriginal-owned vessels have been seen as an unfair restriction. And in April, three Aborigines were sentenced to six months in prison and fined NT$160,000 each because the Forestry Bureau accused them of theft after they removed the remainder of a fallen tree in Smangus, a remote Atayal village in Hsinchu County, in an attempt to maintain their traditional land. These and other incidents are examples of state violence.
Returning to the presidential campaign, Hsieh's proposal to divide Taiwan into six provinces of equal size in a bid to boost competetiveness does not include a blueprint for any self-governed Aboriginal territory. His gesture of donating some books to to an Aboriginal tribe in Beinan Township(卑南鄉), Taitung County, smacks of tokenism.
Meanwhile, the head of the KMT's Culture and Communications Committee, Yang Tu (楊渡), has said that Taiwan is a typical immigrant society that has experienced seven waves of immigration, namely during the Ming dynasty, then under the Dutch and the Spanish, under Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), during the Qing dynasty, during the Japanese era, under the KMT government, and most recently of foreign spouses. Yu said that all these immigrants have enriched Taiwanese culture.
Not only did this constitute yet an example of how Aborigines were only mentioned in passing, it also failed to mention Taiwan's foreign laborers, while denigrating foreign spouses by putting them at the same level as the KMT regime.
Ma's "new Taiwanese" discourse goes no further than the 1995 "new rising peoples" discourse, which divided Taiwan's population into four major ethnic groups.
Both discourses marginalize Aborigines and ignore foreign laborers.
Hsieh also avoids Aboriginal policy and the issues of immigrants and foreign laborers. He is traveling across Taiwan to secure support for his campaign, not to reform the nation.
In fact, behind both the DPP politicians' deceitful hypocrisy and the KMT politicians' thoughtless ignorance we see how the quest for votes and power makes them care for nothing but putting on a show and doing well in public opinion polls.
Because they want a historic foundation for taking Aboriginal land, they see no need to reflect over the fact that every ruler of Taiwan -- the Spanish, the Dutch, Cheng, the Japanese and the KMT and DPP governments ? has been a colonial ruler.
After taking over Taiwan, they have all exploited the disadvantaged.
This helps to explain why the DPP government is playing on Minnan chauvinism to change Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall into the National Taiwan Democracy Hall, while the KMT feels forced to take ridiculous action in response.
Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) absurdly renamed the section of Ketagalan Boulevard in front of the Presidential Office as "Anti-Corruption Democracy Square," triggering Aboriginal protest. However, nobody has proposed tearing down the statue of Cheng in the Chihkan Tower (赤崁樓) in Tainan to safeguard pro-localization values and Aboriginal values in the name of transitional justice.
Both camps use "think globally, act locally" as their slogans, but are unable to reflect on a future based on human and cultural diversity and cannot appreciate traditional Aboriginal lifestyles and their contributions to environmental protection. They also ignore the human rights of foreign spouses and Southeast Asian workers.
As the presidential election approaches, we get an old discourse on a new Taiwan, with foreign laborers and Aborigines being overlooked. How can we expect such politicians to bring new hope for this land and its people?
Along Chen is an assistant professor in the Department of Tourism and Hospitality Management at Kainan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations