The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is in the process of selecting its legislative candidates via a party primary. Legislative candidates in some districts were able to make dramatic gains during the telephone poll phase, which counts for 70 percent of each hopeful's final "score," prompting the party's Bribery Investigation Subcommittee to investigate.
This turn of events begs the question: Does the DPP's primary system help the party to identify its most competent legislative candidates?
The party's candidates for legislator-at-large seats have also not yet been finalized. DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun will only decide on the four candidates that it is within his power to nominate in the next two months. Recent media reports have mentioned Legislator Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮), caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) and former premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) as likely candidates.
The DPP's regulations for nomination of candidates for public offices from the 1990s included a section that stated quite clearly that every third nominee on the list should be an academic "expert" or a member of a disadvantaged group. This demonstrated the respect the DPP had for outside expertise, as well as their efforts to give a voice to the disadvantaged.
At this point, the DPP's primary has produced a legislator-at-large list that basically reflects the party's internal power struggle. Yu should use the maneuvering room given to him by the system to help redeem the party.
Chen Yi-shen is an associate researcher at Academia Sinica's Institute of Modern History.
Translated by Jason Cox
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with