The media has reported on the shortcomings of young academics entering the workplace and on proposals that would give students a better understanding of real-life issues in Harvard University's curriculums.
The reports had two things in common. One was the hope that university students could be closer to the real world; the other that their education give them an appreciation of work ethics.
A few years ago, the general manager of Hewlett-Packard said that what industry wants when it hires employees is based on attitude and not professional knowledge.
In my opinion, university education needs major revisions.
The principal things that career education teaches students are work attitude, ethics, work etiquette and adjustment skills in the work environment. Most of the career courses that universities offer belong to mandatory subjects. Most university students study until they have their 128 credits and then graduate.
But career courses constitute only four to six credits at most. Other students only attend a series of lectures on finding work organized by counseling centers and the National Youth Commission. Because of this, the quality of career education at vocational colleges is much lower than that for education in professional knowledge subjects.
I appeal to educational management offices and vocational colleges to carefully review career education and propose the following:
First, on course planning: The general eduction curriculum needs to be re-evaluated. Apart from fixed general education subjects, career education should be improved and we should not be rigid about credits.
Second, on teachers of career courses: Schools should invite leaders and high-level managers from the professional world. These people could talk about the various demands that will be made of students in the workplace based on their experience. This way, students can become more familiar with the work environment while in school.
Third, on arranging courses: Career courses should be spread across different years so that during four years in university, students can hear what they need to know about working before they enter the workplace. This can be complemented by excursions and internships so that students can obtain experience.
Fourth, vocational schools should encourage "work etiquette" campaigns.
Fifth, schools should implement "service studies," or "labor education" as it used to be called. The traditional content of this subject involves students cleaning the campus. The purpose of such activities is that students can develop a work attitude.
Huang Wan-tran is a professor and academic vice president at the Chung Chou Institute of Technology.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with