The pan-blue camp's obstructionist tactics in the legislature have been commented on here many times over the years, but the latest theatrics of the People First Party (PFP) are something special and worth noting.
Full of bluster, the party on May 15 attempted to impress its supporters on the street and sympathizers in the pan-blue camp generally with threats to topple the Cabinet, even though the new executive line-up was still in the process of forming with the resignation of former premier Su Tseng-chang (
Yesterday, in calling the PFP's bluff, a majority of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers invited the PFP to live up to its word, and offered a motion that would topple the Cabinet if it obtained a reduced number of votes from more aggressive elements in the pan-blue camp.
But the PFP, when offered the sword with which it could have prematurely slashed the legislature in half, blinked.
With Chairman James Soong (
But now that the PFP has refused to exercise the only real power that it will have, it has signaled that the struggle has come to an end.
The curious thing about the party is that even now it carries currency with key sections of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which has been reluctant to crush it underfoot, which it surely could do if it chose to.
Why the KMT would waste its time and resources negotiating with a basket case party when it could be wooing pan-green-camp supporters is an interesting question, and possible answers provide no comfort to pan-blue-camp supporters.
It is as if the KMT wants the PFP's members to segregate themselves from the larger party so that they pose no internal challenge as closing dates for legislative nominations loom.
Potential rivals are better handled at arm's length, it seems, before being sent to their doom.
At the same time, the KMT seems absolutely unable to take decisive and swift action that eliminates threats from within or from those it nominally describes as allies.
This contrasts markedly with the DPP, which has been openly contemptuous toward the Taiwan Solidarity Union, a sign of ruthlessness or political maturity, depending on which part of the pan-green-camp spectrum one favors.
With the PFP hanging around, the slightly less clownish behavior of the more extreme members of the major parties seemed to look just that little bit more mainstream.
In this respect, as well as for many other reasons, the PFP will not be missed after its likely demise in the next legislative elections.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry