On May 16, amid calls for unity following the party's presidential primary, the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) Central Standing Committee finally established a team to draft a "resolution on making Taiwan a normal country" (正常國家決議文) amending the 1999 "Resolution on Taiwan's Future" (台灣前途決議文).
Since its birth in 1986, the DPP has offered four definitions of the nation's political status. This push for another resolution is a review of the 1999 resolution, which is said to have been proposed to attract moderate voters in the 2000 presidential election.
Regardless of the motive, the 1999 resolution rejects neither a national title nor a system of the Republic of China (ROC) -- the main reason why the party has achieved little concerning Taiwan's national status over the past seven years. After President Chen Shui-bian (
Still, the DPP's biggest problems arise from economics rather than the politicals. The 1999 resolution was a byproduct of the party's decision to lean toward the pan-blue camp's economic policy.
In 1996, the DPP, without a clear China policy, elected pro-China Hsu Hsin-liang (許信良) as its seventh chairman. In 1998, Hsu directed an internal DPP debate on party policy and succeeded in promoting the idea of "strengthening the base and going west."
Since then, the pro-localization DPP has been afflicted with the concept of "using business to promote unification."
Economics always influence politics, and the 1999 resolution was created in the atmosphere of economic integration. When the party came to power, the "using business to promote unification" strategy developed further.
In October 2001, those who promoted moving westward directed the creation of the "resolution on creating a new phase for Taiwan's economy" (開創台灣經濟新局決議文), thus putting "boldly go west" in writing. Although it did not mention economic integration or future unification, the policy of "actively promoting the integration of economic resources with China" clearly echoed Beijing's strategy of using business to promote unification.
The damage of the 2001 resolution on Taiwan is self-evident. The new economic phase was never created. Overseas production of our manufacturing industries quickly exceeded 40 percent, with 90 percent of our overseas investment concentrated in China. Unemployment went up, real incomes dropped and businesspeople investing in China benefited while the general public suffered. An M-shaped society has formed, angering the public.
The worst damage was psychological, creating the misconception that China is not our enemy. As a result, Beijing's passing of the "Anti-Secession" Law (
But maybe Taiwan is blessed. I am glad to see the DPP consensus returning to the party's original spirit. The writing of the new resolution is likely to be easily achieved since Taiwan's sovereignty cannot coexist with Beijing's strategy to "use business to promote unification."
I hope that the new resolution empowers the DPP to break away from its contradictory policy of economic unification and political separation, and stop it from eventual unification with China. Hopefully, the new resolution can revive the party's founding spirit, and correct the deficient 1999 and 2001 resolutions.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this