The government on Saturday finally summoned the courage to complete the most provocative act thus far in its efforts to rid the nation of the legacy of its authoritarian past when it held a ceremony to rename Chiang Kai-shek (
And while the park's new name -- National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall -- is far from ideal, the renaming was something that needed to be done, as for far too long the people of Taipei who do not deify the dead dictator have been forced to put up with Chiang's grimacing presence, staring down at them whenever they chose to visit one of the city's more pleasant and peaceful scenic spots.
This time, however, the pan-blue camp has reacted with more restraint than after previous efforts by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government to remove prominent reminders of the former president.
Instead of trying to forcefully prevent the renaming from taking place and mobilizing their supporters to protest the move, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
In a ridiculous move, the city fined the management of the newly renamed memorial for "damaging" a heritage site nominee and decided to rename Ketagalan Boulevard "Anti-Corruption Democracy Square" in a puerile attempt to hit back at President Chen Shui-bian (
Other pan-blue figures have accused the government of acting "illegally," saying that while they are not necessarily opposed to the move, the administration should have gone about it through the proper legal channels.
These arguments would hold water if facts didn't contradict them. Any resident of the capital is fully aware that the city is in the process of installing new bus shelters and signs, so accommodating the new name of the park would require little extra cost and effort on the city government's part.
As for the legality of the change, the reason the government has resorted to such a convoluted legal process in renaming the hall is because it knows that any bill would stand a snowball in hell's chance of making it through the legislature.
For evidence of this, one need only look at how far the bills eradicating the redundant references to China from the names of the post office and the state-owned electricity and oil companies went. The unreasonable blocking of these moves by a stubborn pan-blue caucus provides the answer.
The next challenge facing the administration will be how to dispose of the gigantic bronze statue of Chiang that resides inside the main hall, as any move to remove it is sure to spark protests. This must surely happen soon, as it is inconceivable that an edifice to a man who was the very antithesis of democracy should be permanently housed in a hall now dedicated to democratic transition.
The president has suggested keeping the huge doors locked and that seems to be the best solution for the time being, but sooner or later the statue has to go.
If the government chooses -- as one suspects it will -- to do so before the legislative and presidential votes, then the manner in which the opposition parties react could have a decisive bearing on the outcome of those elections and, more importantly, the nation's immediate future.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations