So people are being killed by petrol-engine pollution ("Taipei Air Pollution alarming: scientists," page 2, May 4). The only real surprise here is that it took until this year for somebody to actually notice, but the solution is extremely simple. Get rid of petrol vehicles.
Not after the elections; not after more studies; now, today.
If you don't believe it's possible, take a look at Phoenix Motorcars electric trucks (www.phoenixmotorcars.com), the electric sports cars from Tesla and Venturi (www.teslamotors.com, and www.venturi.fr) and Zap scooters (www.zapworld.com).
Modern electric vehicles (EVs) outperform petrol vehicles in fuel efficiency, performance and reliability, and they can recharge in minutes.
They're not entirely non-polluting, because their electricity ultimately comes from power stations.
However, they do have an effective fuel efficiency 10 times to 20 times better than petrol engines for city driving, and pollution from power stations is more easily scrubbed than car exhaust smoke.
The EVs mentioned above are designed in the US and Europe.
Why is Taiwan not leading the world with this technology?
Dense cities, short freeways and personal preference for small transport such as scooters make EVs a natural choice.
Cheap supplies of motors and lithium cells from China, and a large readymade domestic market would make EVs affordable for everyone.
Two things are lacking: superstar designers who can produce the kind of eye-catching products that (for example) the French and Italians are famous for; and a government willing to defy big oil and big corporations.
Despite many people having a college degree in Taiwan, there are few outstanding engineers, artists and designers, and the little talent there is get no respect.
Taiwanese corporations are still obsessed with being cheaper, not better.
There is no excuse for this. Government reticence is more understandable: refusing to import American SUVs would almost certainly cause reprisals.
However, with care and statesmanship, it could be done.
Imports of US cars would be replaced by imports of US know-how and high-tech materials, and the US might be reminded of their insistence that "less developed" countries cut their carbon emissions.
The process could start gently, with electric buses and taxis.
Taxis could be banned from customer-trawling and taxi call points installed at convenient locations.
Cars would be next; they take up far too much space and are responsible for most road deaths.
Heavy fuel tax and VAT on petrol cars could subsidize electric scooters and public park-and-charge installations.
Existing petrol cars would fall apart after 10 years to 15 years and EVs would naturally take over.
The next stage would be to get the drivers off the roads, eliminating road accidents as well as pollution.
Electric vehicles are very amenable to automatic control; again, because of Taiwan's unique geography and demographics, it would be especially easy to implement.
Of course, it won't happen.
Automatic EVs would reduce Taiwan's dependence on foreign oil, cut vehicle pollution and scrap-vehicle waste, make commuting more efficient, reduce the need for more MRT services, and massively reduce health-service costs.
Would these measures win votes? No.
Tony Weir
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry