In 1990, the Japanese Coast Guard stopped the organizers of the Taiwan National Games from passing the games' torch through the waters near the Diaoyutai (
On April 26, the Organizing Committee for the Beijing Olympic Games (BOCOG) announced the planned route for the Olympic torch relay, which was in line with the "domestic" route set out by the Chinese Olympic Committee in March last year. Taiwanese officials rejected the proposal, saying that although they would welcome the torch coming to Taiwan for just the second time in history, they found the plan prepared by China's Olympic Committee unacceptable.
When the discussions about the torch coming to Taiwan were just beginning, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) proposed four conditions: the path must follow Olympic protocol, it must be approved by Taiwan, China must guarantee that Taiwan's sovereignty is not belittled, and it must be beneficial to cross-straight relations. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) rules state that countries must give their approval to let the torch pass through. Since Taiwan all along has said that it must give its approval, the refusal is an expression of its national sovereignty. Of course the Taiwanese government has the right to reject any malicious arrangements.
Second, the stipulation that Taiwan's sovereignty must not be belittled was of course meant to keep politics from interfering in sports. But for Beijing to take the peaceful symbol of the torch relay and make it part of its unification campaign, and to claim that Taiwan is a part of China, is a clear attack on Taiwanese sovereignty and a violation of the principle of constructive cross-strait interaction.
Taiwan had hoped that China would continue with this, but China has insisted on calling it "Taipei, China," which implies that it is a part of China, the country. In another telling example of China's political moves in the sports arena, Taiwanese delegates of the World Games in Kaohsiung in 2009 have been refused visas to enter China.
The Kaohsiung mayor, vice mayor and head of the education bureau have not been allowed to go to China to report on the progress of their preparations to the General Association of International Sports Federations. China is clearly a country that is incapable of separating sports from political disputes.
The Beijing organizing committee's route enters East Asia via Australia, then goes to Japan, Seoul, Pyongyang and Vietnam. From Ho Chi Minh City it travels to "Taipei, China" before proceeding to "Hong Kong, China" and "Macau, China," and other parts of China.
With the torch passing by Taiwan at two earlier stages of the route, it would make more sense to plan an Australia-Taiwan-Japan route or a North Korea-Taipei-Vietnam route. China's preference for the Taiwan-Hong Kong path is an attempt to deny Taiwanese sovereignty by connecting Taiwan to its "domestic" relay. This is what Taiwan's government and people find unacceptable.
Nor is Taiwan the only place to reject the torch. With the route possibly passing through Tibet, Tibetan independence groups abroad objected on the grounds that it would amount to an acceptance of the Chinese government's control of Tibet.
The torch's route has implications for whether Taiwan is willing to be marginalized and made a part of China. It also once again highlights the importance and urgency of Taiwan normalizing its national status.
Yeh Chin-hung is an associate professor in the department of financial and economic law at the National Chung Cheng University. Translated by Marc Langer
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with