I am really amused by the letters that the Taipei Times receives and prints so often. A letter seems to carry more weight if you add a title to it because in the world we live in today, a title carries more weight than the actual facts.
The political situation here reminds me a little of the fable about the old man and the boy who intend to sell a donkey at the market -- on their way to the market they each ride the donkey, then end up carrying the donkey, to the dismay of those watching.
Every move the political parties here make is aimed at gathering votes, regardless of who or what suffers.
Your editorial on Wednesday ("Taipei gets its priorities wrong," April 25, page 8) had a single line about road accidents, so lets stop to look at the facts for a moment.
About 1.2 million people die in road accidents and about 50 million are injured each year around the world, yet it is more important to Taiwan's government to simulate a Chinese air raid as opposed to actually enforcing basic traffic laws, including stopping at red traffic lights, driving in designated lanes and using turn signals.
These laws are designed for one purpose -- to prevent deaths.
At the rate people are dying on the roads, the only thing accomplished by not allowing people on the roads for 30 minutes in air raid drills is to save three lives. More people die in road accidents than of AIDS or SARS, but the problem is still considered to be only mildly important and road safety is enforced by the weakest of officials.
The situation is an absolute joke. I can think of at least 20 traffic laws that, if enforced, would not only save lives, but also save the government a great amount of money.
The sad part is that enforcing the laws would not be popular because most people do not care about others. They never have and they probably never will.
I could state my position at work and the degrees I have earned in order to prompt readers to investigate what I am saying further. On the other hand, I could assume your readers are intelligent enough to understand the problem on their own.
I am going to opt for the latter, as yours is the only politically correct newspaper -- with correct meaning the truth, not acceptable.
Gerhard Erasmus
Yonghe
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.