The Executive Yuan has been instructed by President Chen Shui-bian (
There has even been discussion about implementing the amnesty by May 20, the anniversary of Chen's inauguration.
While there are some merits to the amnesty plan, the government must carefully consider the repercussions it could have.
Immediately after the bill was announced, the pan-blue camp blasted the amnesty as a ploy to win votes in the year-end legislative election rather than a way to give those who have been convicted of minor crimes another chance.
As for the pan-green camp, it cannot be assumed that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would score any points with voters just because it offered an amnesty.
Only the inmates who would be released from prison early and their immediate families and friends would directly benefit.
Most others would probably feel indifferent or even a bit uneasy at the thought of criminals returning to society.
It should not be forgotten that excessively high crime rates continue to be perceived by most Taiwanese as a serious social problem.
Middle-class families -- the so-called moderate voters that the DPP desperately wants to win over -- rate crime as their single biggest concern.
Making matters worse, the government has not offered any compelling reason for the amnesty.
The first reason put forth -- that it has been 16 years since an amnesty was granted, 20 years since martial law was lifted and 60 years since the 228 Incident -- doesn't hold water.
The 1991 amnesty took place right after former president Lee Teng-hui (
Thus, the 1991 amnesty was granted not only as a way to commemorate the lifting of martial law, but also to free those who had been jailed for speaking out against oppressive one-party rule.
The Chen administration also said its proposed amnesty was targeted at reducing crowding in the nation's prisons.
Unfortunately, some see the burgeoning prison population as a result of the incompetent policies of the DPP administration.
To avoid stirring too much controversy, the Executive Yuan has repeatedly said that only those serving sentences of less than one year for minor and petty crimes would be eligible to receive a reduced sentence or amnesty.
The problem with this is that coming up with a definition of minor and petty crimes is very difficult. Certainly, the victims of crime never view the injustices done to them as minor.
As the government struggles with listing the crimes that are eligible for the amnesty, it removes an increasing number of offenses, reducing its scope.
The result is that the impact of the amnesty will become smaller and fail to accomplish what Chen had hoped for.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under