Cho Seung-hui, the culprit behind the killing spree at Virginia Tech on April 16, video-taped a statement about the massacre at the university and mailed it to the television network NBC midway through his shooting rampage. When the parcel unexpectedly arrived at NBC, it was a morbid temptation for the station's management.
For the next 12 hours, the station was torn between viewer ratings and journalistic ethics. Finally, after an intense seven-hour closed-door debate, NBC management decided to inform the FBI and Virginia State Police and hand over the DVD and the associated material to law enforcement officers, keeping copies and continuing their analysis to confirm its authenticity.
Not until after the police announced in the afternoon that NBC had received the parcel from Cho and agreed to NBC airing it did the network air the footage that evening after carefully editing out offensive and sensational footage.
Despite this cautious handling, because this was the worst campus shooting incident in US history and it touched on the sensitive topic of ethnic conflict, it was not surprising to see NBC overwhelmed by a wave of sharp criticism from academic circles and society as a whole for broadcasting Cho's video.
What was unexpected, however, was that this media controversy -- which is being so hotly debated in the US -- has been used by TVBS to quell criticism of its mishandling of the gangster footage scandal. TVBS, when reporting news about the Virginia Tech shootings, has stressed that in the pursuit of the truth even internationally known NBC chose to broadcast the highly controversial footage.
When commenting on NBC's coverage, Taiwan's Satellite Television Broadcasting Association (STBA), a media watchdog which has hardly ever dealt with media discipline since its establishment, actually said that NBC's broadcast of Cho's images was as terrible as the gangster footage filmed and directed by TVBS reporters, and that since each country follows different criteria for media control, the association is now at a loss as to what to do.
I can not agree with this rationale.
The NBC and TVBS incidents are totally different in nature. It was not NBC that filmed Cho's video footage. Instead, it was Cho himself who sent the video he shot to NBC. TVBS' gangster footage was shot by the station's own reporters who then lied to the police saying they had received the video from the gangster.
In short, TVBS claim that it received the parcel from the gangster was not true, and that's why police are still investigating who actually instigated the video in the first place. Compared with NBC's handling of Cho's video, TVBS' handling of the gangster video is not a comparable circumstance.
The TVBS video footage has tarnished the image of Taiwan's TV stations and damaged public trust in the media. At this juncture, do we really need the illogical pairing of these events?
The nation's media should learn from NBC's cautious handling of the Cho footage before it decided to broadcast it and from the way other US media outlets showed self restraint and self discipline after NBC's airing caused severe criticism. We viewers should learn from the civic awareness displayed by Americans who refused to watch these violent images and the parents of victims and the school staff who protested by refusing to perform previously agreed-upon interviews.
Lilian Wang is an associate professor at National Chengchi University's journalism department.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry