Mention Asia, and most people think of the region's fascinating, rising giants, China or India -- or both. Or people think about North Korea's nuclear program, some terrorist incident, or the humanitarian consequences of the latest earthquake or tsunami. But often overlooked -- or at least underestimated -- is Japan.
This is odd, given that Japan is still the world's second-largest economy, with a GDP of US$5 trillion -- more than China and India combined. Despite Japan's relatively modest rate of economic growth, its GDP per capita is roughly US$38,000, more than 10 times that of either China or India.
Moreover, there are important stirrings in Japan that suggest change on both the economic and security fronts. The 1990s may have been a lost decade, but Japan's economy has begun to recover, now growing at more than 2 percent a year and boasting several firms that are truly global and hugely successful.
Changes in foreign and defense policy are more considerable. Japan's Defense Agency was upgraded in January to a full ministry. Japan now spends more than US$40 billion a year on defense and maintains one of the world's most diverse and modern militaries. Approximately 1,000 Japanese forces serve in and around Iraq. Intellectuals, journalists and politicians are now saying and writing things about Japan's role in the world that were unthinkable a decade ago. It is a question of when, not if, the Japanese amend Article IX of their Constitution, which limits the role of Japan's armed forces to self-defense.
Not everyone will welcome these changes. Japan's neighbors, who continue to harbor concerns stemming from World War II and Japan's failure to deal adequately with its history, will worry about Japanese nationalism. Nevertheless, a more active and more capable Japan, with a robust democracy and a thriving economy, is in its neighbors' best interests. The danger is not renewed Japanese militarism, but rather a Japan that is unable and unwilling to do its share to meet the regional and global challenges facing Asia.
Japan, for its part, needs to continue to open and reform its economy, improve its military and make its forces available for the sort of low-intensity but manpower-intensive missions, ranging from genocide prevention to nation-building to peacekeeping, that are increasingly required in the greater Middle East and Africa.
Japanese leaders also need to act with sensitivity. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is off to an uneven start. On one hand, he is wise not to have visited the Yasukuni shrine, which honors millions of Japan's war dead, including 14 Class A war criminals. On the other hand, Abe has made public statements denying Japan's coercion of "comfort women" in China and Korea.
It is essential that Japan and China forge a modern relationship. The increasing frequency of high-level visits -- Abe went to China in October, and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
The world also needs to take into account Japan's importance. Japan should no longer be denied fair treatment because of events more than 60 years ago. There is no reason Japan should not hold a permanent seat in the UN Security Council.
Japan should also be a full participant in Asian regional arrangements. Asia is rich in dynamism, but relatively thin in influential political, economic, and security-related institutions, in contrast to Europe, which often lacks dynamism but is institution-heavy. The Franco-German relationship, central to much 20th-century conflict, now forms the core of modern Europe. The goal should be the same for China and Japan.
The agenda is virtually limitless, including trade and investment, energy and climate change, and confidence-building in the security sphere. A new regional institution could be based on an existing one -- such as the six-party arrangement used to manage North Korea's nuclear challenge -- or start afresh.
Moreover, just as the US continues to play a major role in Europe, so, too, should it act as a guarantor of Asia's stability and a source of regional prosperity. The US-Japan alliance is central to the US' position in Asia. The goal is not to enlist Japan in any anti-Chinese coalition, but rather to increase the depth and breadth of US-Japanese cooperation. Both countries have many reasons to pursue this goal, considering North Korea's missile and nuclear programs, terrorism and the numerous challenges to stability around the world.
Abe's visit to Washington late this month is an opportunity to continue to modernize a relationship conceived in an earlier geopolitical era. It is to be hoped that it will not be overshadowed by calls in Congress for Japan to apologize more formally than it already has for the comfort women. Rather, the focus should be on the future and on welcoming the emergence of a Japan that is increasingly able and willing to act as a partner of the US in addressing regional and global challenges.
Richard Haass is president of the US Council on Foreign Relations.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under