"Misguided" does not begin to describe the utter idiocy and irresponsibility of two Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators who staged a "mock" attack on National Taiwan University yesterday.
DPP legislators Lin Kuo-ching (
This reasoning is not only asinine, it is demonstrative of a disconnect with reality that should be a cause of grave concern to any of the constituents represented by these two infantile miscreants.
No less at fault are the members of the media and Ministry of Education officials who went along with this misadventure. The episode is yet another black mark against the unprofessional nature of most newsgathering organizations in this country.
For reporters to allow themselves to be led around by the nose by people in power, without ever stopping to question their motives and their judgment, is an abdication of the fundamental role of a journalist. A reporter's "observer" status does not grant him or her immunity from one's responsibilities as a citizen and human being or negate the duty to intervene when lives are potentially at stake.
All of the members of the print and broadcast media who accompanied the legislators on their little stunt should, at the very least, have aggressively confronted the lawmakers about what they were doing and, at best, informed the police about what was clearly a criminal act with major safety concerns. However, only a handful reacted with the appropriate concern.
Meanwhile, the DPP should be berated for its usual lackadaisical response. Instead of inanities about "accepting responsibility," the party should be calling for blood. "Revoking membership" is a more appropriate catchphrase to employ.
"Faking" a violent criminal act without the cooperation and advance notification of the police is not only dangerous, it is indicative of a total disregard for even the slightest semblance of common sense.
"Can't legislators have a say in campus security after an international tragedy?" asked Lee, melodramatically weeping at the "injustice" of people calling his judgment into question after the incident.
Well Mr. Lee, since you asked ... No. Absolutely not. The last thing we need is a bunch of superficial politicians jockeying for media coverage and trying to upstage each other with half-baked false alarms that the professionals aren't aware are staged.
In the classic film The Third Man, the hapless protagonist Holly Martins insists on interfering in a complex criminal investigation, prompting Major Calloway to tell him: "Death is at the bottom of everything, Martins. Leave death to the professionals."
When law enforcement officials are called to the scene of what they believe to be a potentially violent situation involving innocent bystanders, they must react with utter seriousness and be prepared to use deadly force to save lives.
The 50-odd police officers who descended on the university did not know that two self-absorbed politicians were desperately trying to establish their relevance as their jobs head toward the chopping block. All that the responding officers knew was that there was a possible hostage situation at a university involving two armed suspects.
The police would have been absolutely justified in using every bit of force at their disposal to ensure the students' safety -- including shooting to kill.
The legislators should count themselves lucky they were not discovered by a police sniper while carrying on their charade.
Had this been the case, there might be two new empty seats in the legislature. It is hard not to think that it would be improved by the development.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry