With the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, French-US relations reached a low point. The administration of US President George W. Bush felt betrayed by French diplomatic tactics at the UN, while French President Jacques Chirac felt confirmed in his mistrust of the sole superpower and his call for a multipolar world. Today, on the eve of the French presidential elections, opinion polls show that three-quarters of French voters believe that France should distance itself from the US.
Despite a long history of alliance dating back to the American Revolution and including two world wars, France has always had a somewhat ambivalent attitude toward the US, and the Iraq War was not the first time that a controversial security policy undercut the US' attractiveness in France. Polls show similar reactions after the Suez Crisis of 1956, the Vietnam War in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and the deployment of intermediate range missiles in Europe in the early 1980s.
In addition, France has long had a strand of anti-US sentiment. Some conservatives disliked the crude egalitarianism of US culture, while some on the left have seen US faith in markets as a symbol of capitalist exploitation of the working class. After World War II, France banned Coca-Cola for a time, and, more recently, the farmer Jos Bov became a folk hero by destroying a McDonald's restaurant. But the French still flock to McDonald's and to theaters playing US movies, despite limits on their import.
While such ambivalence will not change, French-US relations are likely to improve no matter which of the three leading candidates prevails in the final round of voting on May 6, in part owing to Chirac's exit. In fact, French-US relations have already begun to improve, as both sides realized that their pubic dispute was damaging their interests. The exit of some of the most strident neo-conservatives in the Bush administration over the past year has also helped, and with growing opposition to the Iraq War, some US citizens are beginning to think that the French may have had a point after all.
Of the three major candidates, conservative Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy has expressed the most pro-US views and traveled to Washington for a photo opportunity with Bush. He told a Washington audience that anti-Americanism was an elite indulgence not shared by the French at large.
"The truth is that the French listen to Madonna, just as they used to love listening to Elvis and Sinatra," Sarkozy said. "And all French parents dream of sending their child to an American university."
Sarkozy said: "The virulence of the press and a portion of French elites against the United States reflects a certain envy of your brilliant success."
In response, an adviser to the socialist candidate Segolene Royal labeled Sarkozy "an American neo-conservative with a French passport."
But while Royal has been careful to placate her socialist base, she has also talked about the need for market reforms in the French economy, and taken some foreign policy positions on Iran and Turkey that are closer to the US view than are Sarkozy's.
The centrist candidate, former education minister Francois Bayrou, has relatives in the US and has called for a "third way" in French politics analogous to the paths forged by former US president Bill Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
The candidates differ in other ways as well. Both Sarkozy and Royal have appealed to nationalism. Sarkozy has boasted that he expelled tens of thousands of illegal immigrants when he was interior minister, and in 2005 he referred to Muslim rioters in the suburbs as "scum."
Aware of the ultra-nationalist threat from rival Jean-Marie Le Pen, who took second place in the 2002 presidential election, Sarkozy has said that he wants "to talk to those who have moved to/ward the far right because they are suffering."
While Royal has been critical of Sarkozy, she, too, has appealed to nationalism, calling for a "reconquest of the symbols of the nation" from the right.
Only Bayrou has denounced the "nationalistic obsession" that has marked the campaign.
But one should not read too much into these differences. All three candidates support Chirac's opposition to the Iraq War, will protect French agriculture in global trade negotiations, and will promote French leadership in Europe. Despite French voters' rejection of a new constitution for the EU in 2005 -- in part a protest vote against Chirac -- all three candidates recognize that the EU has been an important means to enhance French power in world affairs. None is likely to become a US poodle.
Indeed, that is not the way French politics works. French leaders often like to be seen resisting US pressure before striking a compromise and cooperating in a manner that serves both French and US interests. Friction with the US is thus inevitable, but in the long run there is usually fruitful cooperation.
Despite the tension of the past few years, Europe and the US have cooperated in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and Iran, and on countering al-Qaeda.
Whatever the outcome of the French election, French-US relations are likely to remain on a steady course, and may well improve further after the US presidential election next year.
Joseph Nye is a professor at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under