The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has adopted a variety of pan-blue voter exclusion measures in the public opinion polls used to determine the nominations for its legislators-at-large, legislators and presidential candidate in the year-end legislative elections and next year's presidential election. This decision will affect who is nominated and it will also affect the power of the party's technically dissolved factions. More bluntly, it will have a direct impact on the DPP's intra-party democracy.
Be it the election of the party chairperson and representatives, revisions to the party platform or charter, or the nomination of party election candidates, support from party members, representatives or supporters should be required. In this regard, the pan-blue exclusion measure has been endorsed as the standard for intra-party democracy by the DPP's Central Standing Committee and Central Executive Committee.
Still, "intra-party democracy" must not conflict with the rights of party members, ethnic groups and social classes as stated in Article 7 of Constitution -- which states that, "All citizens of the Republic of China, irrespective of sex, religion, race, class, or party affiliation, shall be equal before the law."
First, the DPP's primary for the legislator-at-large nomination list, which will adopt a high degree of pan-blue exclusion, is a deliberate attempt to prevent Shen Fu-hsiung (沈富雄), Lo Wen-chia (羅文嘉) and Fan Sun-lu (范巽綠) -- who find support among moderate voters and some pan-blue supporters -- from being nominated.
However, all DPP members should be considered equal regardless of whether they are considered deep-green warriors or someone who has betrayed the party.
The restrictions imposed by the pan-blue exclusion measure appear aimed at ensuring that future legislators-at-large will serve "the whole party" rather than the whole nation. This would breach the constitutional principle of equality between people with different political opinions -- and by extension between Mainlanders and Taiwanese -- since both light greens and light blues also have the right to choose whether or not to identify with the DPP.
Since the DPP's primary for legislators-at-large is also 50 percent based on a vote by party members, those who control a large number of members -- mostly wealthy, deep-green supporters -- can dictate the primary results and thus make sure that the trio mentioned above are not nominated.
The DPP appears to have abandoned its founding spirit, discarding localization, democracy and anti-corruption platforms. Because swing voters cannot be said to be pro-localization and because staunch deep-green supporters are planning to adopt a high degree pan-blue exclusionary measure, democracy and anti-corruption are being eroded.
Second, the DPP's primary for the regular legislator nomination list, which will adopt a moderate degree of pan-blue exclusionary measures, appeals to those who identify themselves with the DPP rather than individual candidates.
The strange thing is that the DPP's presidential primary is going to adopt a low degree of pan-blue exclusionary measures in public opinion polls in the hope that the winning candidate will come out ahead by attracting swing voters as well as those who identify themselves with the DPP.
What seems controversial is that since the future legislators and president will be elected from single-member districts, why would certain voters be excluded from participating in the opinion polls that help the DPP select its legislative candidates?
Looking at the issue in procedural terms, the DPP's primaries should follow the same standards when it comes to excluding pan-blue voters to meet the game rules the party has set for its internal power. Since both the legislative and presidential elections use a single-member district system but incorporate some degree of pan-blue exclusionary measures, does the DPP believe that its legislative and presidential candidates are not on an equal footing?
The DPP's move is clearly a throwback to the feudal era.
And not only that. Given the DPP's adoption of a moderate degree of pan-blue exclusionary measures in its legislative candidate opinion polls it is questionable whether its candidates -- apart from relying on their identification with the party -- will be able to attract a majority of moderate voters.
What's more, if the DPP attempts to create a "Chen Ming-wen" (陳明文) effect -- named after the former KMT member who defected to the DPP following the 2002 mayoral and county commissioner elections -- how will they be able to adopt both moderate pan-blue exclusionary measures and a moderate pan-blue welcoming approach to attract potential pan-blue renegades?
Since attracting pan-blue renegades requires a moderate pan-blue welcoming approach, the DPP should be fishing for pan-blue rather than pan-green swing voters.
True internal democracy requires coming up with game rules that better match the party's characteristics.
If the DPP wants to remain the catch-all-party it claims to be in its party charter, it shouldn't try to exclude pan-blues and attract only green voters. To do so would stifle fundamental equality among party members, ethnic groups and social classes, while abandoning the party's localization, democracy and anti-corruption line.
Chen Chao-chien is an assistant professor at Ming Chuan University's department of public affairs.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs