Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (
Unfortunately, beyond the glib speeches and photo-op smiles, little of substance emerged. This is because speeches and diplomatic posturing alone cannot solve the disputes between the two regional powerhouses over attitudes toward Japan's invasion of China in the 1930s, Beijing's increasing military buildup and concerns about how to utilize energy resources in the East China Sea.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe signaled his intent to seek friendlier relations with China by traveling to Beijing immediately after assuming the post last October.
Certainly, friendlier relations are welcome, given the unreasonable way in which China has sought to smother questions about its militarization, its reliance on hypernationalism and its refusal to democratize by focusing on Japan's military aggression in the first half of the 20th century.
"The Chinese people suffered calamity during the war of invasion launched by Japan," Wen said in his speech to the Diet. "We sincerely hope that Japan will manifest this stance and promise in practical actions."
Of course, it has been pointed out before that the Chinese Communist Party has few lessons to offer anyone about being peace-loving and non-aggressive.
It was, after all, the People's Republic of China (PRC) that invaded Tibet in 1949; it was People's Liberation Army (PLA) "volunteers" that Beijing sent to war against South Korea and the UN in 1950; it was an attack on a mountain patrol by PRC forces in 1962 that set off a border war with India; it was the PRC that fought armed clashes with the Soviet Union in 1969; and in 1979, the PLA finally learned circumspection after the bloody debacle that marked China's invasion of Vietnam.
Need we mention the millions of Chinese who died in the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward? Can we talk about the thousands that perished in the Tiananmen Square Massacre? Do we dare point out the tens of thousands who are tortured, imprisoned and executed by the regime in Beijing?
So it is with little comfort that one hears Wen speak the words: "I can take personal responsibility in telling you that China holds up the banner of peaceful development."
From our perspective, the "banner of peaceful development" looks like a death shroud, and the hands clasping it look like the claws of desperate animals.
"We will strive with all our might to achieve peaceful resolution of the Taiwan issue, but we will never tolerate Taiwan independence," Wen said. "We hope that Japan can understand the highly sensitive nature of the Taiwan issue, abide by its pledges and handle the issue prudently."
Yes, Mr. Premier, we in Taiwan also hope that the issue is handled prudently. By Beijing. We hope that everyone can understand the "highly sensitive nature" of the issue.
But we also hope that China does not keep its promises, which have ranged from using nuclear weapons against US cities to thwart intervention, to invading this peaceful, prosperous nation by the year 2020.
So enjoy your trip to Tokyo, Mr. Wen. Do all you can to nullify the animosity that exists between some parts of your government and some in Japan's.
But you'll have to excuse us if we struggle not to roll our eyes at your promises of friendship, peace and happiness.
We've heard it all before.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.