Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (
Unfortunately, beyond the glib speeches and photo-op smiles, little of substance emerged. This is because speeches and diplomatic posturing alone cannot solve the disputes between the two regional powerhouses over attitudes toward Japan's invasion of China in the 1930s, Beijing's increasing military buildup and concerns about how to utilize energy resources in the East China Sea.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe signaled his intent to seek friendlier relations with China by traveling to Beijing immediately after assuming the post last October.
Certainly, friendlier relations are welcome, given the unreasonable way in which China has sought to smother questions about its militarization, its reliance on hypernationalism and its refusal to democratize by focusing on Japan's military aggression in the first half of the 20th century.
"The Chinese people suffered calamity during the war of invasion launched by Japan," Wen said in his speech to the Diet. "We sincerely hope that Japan will manifest this stance and promise in practical actions."
Of course, it has been pointed out before that the Chinese Communist Party has few lessons to offer anyone about being peace-loving and non-aggressive.
It was, after all, the People's Republic of China (PRC) that invaded Tibet in 1949; it was People's Liberation Army (PLA) "volunteers" that Beijing sent to war against South Korea and the UN in 1950; it was an attack on a mountain patrol by PRC forces in 1962 that set off a border war with India; it was the PRC that fought armed clashes with the Soviet Union in 1969; and in 1979, the PLA finally learned circumspection after the bloody debacle that marked China's invasion of Vietnam.
Need we mention the millions of Chinese who died in the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward? Can we talk about the thousands that perished in the Tiananmen Square Massacre? Do we dare point out the tens of thousands who are tortured, imprisoned and executed by the regime in Beijing?
So it is with little comfort that one hears Wen speak the words: "I can take personal responsibility in telling you that China holds up the banner of peaceful development."
From our perspective, the "banner of peaceful development" looks like a death shroud, and the hands clasping it look like the claws of desperate animals.
"We will strive with all our might to achieve peaceful resolution of the Taiwan issue, but we will never tolerate Taiwan independence," Wen said. "We hope that Japan can understand the highly sensitive nature of the Taiwan issue, abide by its pledges and handle the issue prudently."
Yes, Mr. Premier, we in Taiwan also hope that the issue is handled prudently. By Beijing. We hope that everyone can understand the "highly sensitive nature" of the issue.
But we also hope that China does not keep its promises, which have ranged from using nuclear weapons against US cities to thwart intervention, to invading this peaceful, prosperous nation by the year 2020.
So enjoy your trip to Tokyo, Mr. Wen. Do all you can to nullify the animosity that exists between some parts of your government and some in Japan's.
But you'll have to excuse us if we struggle not to roll our eyes at your promises of friendship, peace and happiness.
We've heard it all before.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more