In a recent speech at the Ketagalan Institute, President Chen Shui-bian (
"People have tried to paint his administration as one that stirs up ethnic tension," the article paraphrases Chen as saying.
Amen to A-bian for that understatement, as it is about time the DPP set the record straight.
The political divide does not occur on a progressive-conservative scale.
Instead, the differences between the two camps -- the pan-blue and the pan-green -- are usually oversimplified and reduced to "ethnic" difference.
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) fell into the trap of stereotypes when he said: "There have been discussions at home and abroad ... about the appropriateness of the political elite of a minority ethnic group governing a majority ethnic group," ("Wang Jin-pyng to skip KMT primary," April 3, page 1).
One wishes Wang had gone a little bit further in defining who exactly these groups are comprised of, but a hint is all he left us.
Let us look at the words "ethnic" and "ethnicity." A quick glance at the definition of ethnicity on the Wikipedia Web site suffices to realize that it is an enormously complex concept, to such an extent that it can be made to mean almost anything by anybody -- a dangerous thing in and of itself.
In the US, it is mostly used as a cover word for "race."
The more I hear about how "race" is supposed to refer to "Mainlander," "Native" or "Hoklo," the more I need someone to respond to the challenge of defining what these concepts really mean for the country. Perhaps an analogous situation in another country would help shed light on the situation here.
In other words, we can't refer to "ethnic" unless it compares with other, proven examples of situations where clear-cut ethnicity played a role in state affairs.
In the end, however, it doesn't really matter what ethnic means. Where it gains its importance is in how the concept is used.
It can be used as a red herring or a smokescreen. A red herring can be loosely defined as a false statement is used to divert attention from an issue.
The basic idea behind the ethnicity card is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and onto another topic. This type of "reasoning" looks something like this:
1. Topic A is under discussion.
2. Topic B is introduced under the guise of being relevant to topic A (when topic B actually isn't).
3. Topic A is dropped.
Applied to Taiwanese politics, the technique is used as follows:
1. Taiwan should change the name of the post-office and bank from China to Taiwan.
2. There you go again, the opposition says, fanning "ethnic" difference.
3. Name-change is dropped.
The meaning of ethnicity is in reality secondary to its rhetorical function: to create a diversion.
As for the word "ethnic," the major metaphor used is often "stirring" or "fanning the flames of," both of which conjure images of irresponsible behavior performed by someone who is reckless in nature. In other words, the term is often ascribed to Chen and the Democratic Progressive Party.
Politics -- in Taiwan and elsewhere -- is a language game. The academic discipline best positioned to understand the war of words is cognitive linguistics.
Once one cuts through the semantics and boils the debate to its essence, it becomes evident that the issue that really matters was there all along -- freedom.
Michael Loncar
Pingtung County
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry