Malaysia is carefully easing back decades-old policies favoring its ethnic majority Malays to draw foreign investment, but may face political dissent over the move, analysts say.
Malaysia since the 1970s has retained affirmative action policies for Malays and indigenous groups known as "bumiputras" in order to close a wealth gap with the minority Chinese community.
But in a dramatic change, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi last month lifted some of the policies as the country aggressively seeks to attract much-needed foreign investment.
Under the rules, bumiputras must hold at least 30 percent of equity in any company, and they should be the majority of workers.
But Abdullah dropped the rules to lure foreign firms in healthcare, tourism and four other service sectors in the Iskandar Development Region (IDR), a massive development in southern Johor state that Malaysia aims to turn into a gleaming commercial hub across from booming Singapore.
In a further relaxation last week, he agreed to allow 100-percent foreign equity ownership in Islamic financial institutions conducting business in foreign currencies.
Analysts say Abdullah and his government are treading softly for fear of a political backlash from the ruling United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), which has built a rock-solid support base as a champion of Malay rights.
"They are trying to tone down the reality that they need to find ways to basically go around 30 years of affirmative action," said Wan Suhaimi Saidi, an economist with Kenanga Investment Bank.
The government had already exempted some companies, including those in manufacturing and in a high-tech hub south of the capital.
But in terms of stock market capitalization and as an investment destination, Malaysia remains a "pale shadow of itself compared to 10 years ago," Citigroup said in October, citing the slow pace of economic liberalization.
Malaysia is Southeast Asia's third-largest economy, but in 2005 foreign direct investment fell to 15 billion ringgit (US$4.3 billion) from 17.6 billion ringgit in 2004.
The country faces strong competition from regional economies including China and Vietnam in the hunt for foreign funds, analysts say.
"Malaysia realized that it needed to fast track on giving more incentives to investors," Wan Suhaimi said.
"They have to do this or else they're going to lose out to other countries like Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam," he said.
Jeff Hurst, executive director of the American Malaysian Chamber of Commerce, said Malaysia's equity controls were disincentives to investors.
"Control is key," Hurst said. "If companies have more control, they are more apt to make larger-sized investments and are more apt to put in higher-value operations like research and development."
Despite concerns the affirmative action policies have bred an over-reliance on concessions and favored an elite, they have been fiercely guarded by the government and UMNO, which has ruled Malaysia since independence in 1957.
"Politically, it requires Malaysians to accept competition as a fact of life," Shahrir Abdul Samad, a prominent lawmaker, said of the changes.
The head of research for CLSA Securities Malaysia, Niklas Olausson, said the government knew it had to start liberalizing.
"They are taking a big-picture view of this, and whatever political ramifications there are will be limited, because these are measured efforts," he said.
"UMNO leaders themselves can understand it's the start of the transformation of the Malaysian economy" from one based on manufacturing exports to a more service-based economy, Shahrir said.
He denied there would be any party backlash, although the IDR project has already reportedly attracted criticism from former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, who said last week that Malays would not be able to compete with foreigners.
As a measure of the sensitivities involved, differences over the affirmative action policies helped bog down free-trade talks between Malaysia and the US this year.
Malaysia repeatedly stated that the policies were "no go" areas.
On one hand, the government knows the right policy is to dismantle the affirmative action rules, independent political analyst Khoo Kay Peng said.
"On the other hand, they cannot do it because they have to play to their constituents," Khoo added. "That is a problem."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under