Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has made several mistakes in saying: "Chiang [Kai-shek, 蔣介石] made a great contribution in restoring, defending and developing Taiwan" ("Thousands protest anti-Chiang campaign," April 1, page 3).
Taiwan was not "restored" but changed status at the end of World War II. Chinese Nationalist forces under Chiang contributed nothing to this change of status.
It was the two US atomic bombs dropped in Japan that really changed the status of Taiwan.
A change can be for the better or worse.
Unfortunately, this change in status made Taiwanese suffer from the longest period of martial law in the history of the world. The so-called "free China" under Chiang's dictatorship was neither free nor China.
No wonder some older people in Taiwan miss Japanese rule.
Chiang intended to use Taiwanese soldiers and his remaining armed forces to "reclaim the mainland." It was the US that stopped his impossible plan.
At that time, Taiwan was defended from possible Chinese attack by the US Seventh Fleet that patrolled in the Taiwan Strait.
Chiang's insistence that "The Han and the thief are incompatible" and his refusal to accept a US proposal to seat Taiwan in its General Assembly concurrent with China have haunted Taiwan ever since.
Chiang's anti-communist attitude was strong, but this attitude was not inherited by his followers. Instead, they boycott the purchase of weapons that would defend Taiwan.
And Ma wants to betray Taiwanese through "ultimate unification."
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with