Hurdles abound on the road to Taiwan's decolonization.
For starters, Taiwan's domestic purveyors of Chinese colonialism have to be politically humbled. Only by thoroughly dispiriting these people to the extent that they abandon all hope of unifying Taiwan with China can they be forced to resign themselves to the notion that their future -- as well as that of their off-spring -- lies in either Taiwan or China, but not both.
In this way, transitional justice -- the key to Taiwan's decolonization -- could be implemented properly.
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
The real source of the party's fear of transitional justice is that it would in fact alleviate the collective angst of Taiwan's "Mainlander" minority -- thereby accelerating the dissolution of a KMT voting bloc.
This KMT-perpetuated "Mainlander" siege mentality, a perverted phobia against decolonization, and the party's stolen assets constitute the two pillars that shore up the KMT -- a party that ultimately advocates selling out Taiwan at some point.
The fact that a political party like this is allowed to survive -- thrive even -- suggests that Taiwanese society is in feeble health.
Decolonization's success depends on the disruption of this outrage to democracy.
Beijing's designs on Taiwan aside, Tokyo and Washington should support Taiwan's decolonization in the interest of lasting peace in the region -- which is in keeping with their national security interests.
The relevance of Taiwan's decolonization to Tokyo is evident from recent remarks made by Shoichi Nakagawa, policy chief of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, who said: "If something goes awry in Taiwan in the next 15 years, then within 20 years Japan might become just another one of China's provinces. If Taiwan comes under China's complete rule, Japan could be next."
What's left unsaid is that, in the process, a war involving China, Japan, Taiwan and the US would inevitably have taken place. Millions would have suffered.
US State Department Spokesman Sean McCormack's recent remarks against Taiwan's renaming of state-run enterprises notwithstanding, history -- and the US' own colonial past -- could have justified Washington's support for Taiwan's decolonization efforts.
A case in point is what happened in Taiwan around the time of Japan's surrender at the end of World War II or, more precisely, the US' role in what transpired before and after the 228 Incident.
The then Supreme Allied Command, being fully appraised of Chiang Kai-shek's (蔣介石) dismal human-rights record, agreed to Chiang's occupation of Taiwan -- a region hostile to Chiang's army.
The US military reportedly provided aegis to boats bearing Taiwan-bound Chinese occupation forces -- including those arriving in Taiwan eight days after the 228 Incident with specific orders to commence slaughtering of unarmed Taiwanese civilians.
What's astonishing is how indifferent the US government was to the fate of Taiwanese cowering under incessant gunfire during the weeks the KMT army carried out its "island-wide cleansing" to systematically rid Taiwan of political leadership and stamp out potential dissidents.
In addition to the killings, many more were sadistically tortured.
No less inexplicable is the fact that the US government turned a cold shoulder to the plight of Taiwanese during 40 years of martial law-enforced colonial rule by the KMT.
It can therefore be concluded that Washington had a hand in the last colonization that put the Taiwanese in the situation they find themselves today.
Randall Schriver, former US deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, wrote that Washington is "ahistoric" in its policy-making ("The 228 Incident and American perceptions," Feb. 28, page 8).
In that case, Washington should maintain the same silence now -- when Taiwan is laboring to bring an end to colonialism -- as it did when the Taiwanese were trampled by Chinese colonial forces escorted ashore by US forces 60 years ago.
And that's without even considering the fact that the neo-colonialism against which Taiwan is endeavoring to put up a firewall could proliferate far beyond Taiwan's borders.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry