Splashing holy water over commuters, the Buddhist monks clutch their saffron robes around their knees and squeeze on to the crowded decks of ferries lined up in the translucent dusk on the Hlaing river.
Above the estuary, the glow from thousands of imported Chinese candles fills the windows of the old quarters of Yangon. In the private back room of a smoky riverside tea house, dock workers gloomily slurp flat grey noodles from porcelain bowls and curse the power cuts that have left Myanmar's capital a virtual ghost town after dark.
In a corner, Ko Min Shah looks furtively towards the door, half expecting the "Em-Eye," Myanmar's sadistic military intelligence service. He scribbles in frustration as his Biro runs out.
"I want to write a message for you with my wife's details, to take out for me. You can carry it to the Thai border; she may be there. There are charities there who can help me, no?" he says hopefully. "I'm not politically motivated. I'm just trying to find my wife. There is no real dissent here in Yangon. People are too scared to be members of any democratic movement. We are all just victims, people like me who are trying to get their lives back."
Ko Min, 47, his wife and two sons were swept up with hundreds of others in a military raid on their village close to the city of Bagan in 2005. The family were put to work clearing jungle and digging latrines and an irrigation system for a military camp outside Mandalay.
"My youngest son and I only managed to escape last November," he says. "It was the rainy season and we were swept down a ravine and managed to escape the camp. I still don't know if my wife and eldest are there. I see her every night breaking rocks at the roadside. She is in my nightmares, not my dreams."
"Porterage," a colonial euphemism meaning forced menial labor, sits at the heart of the humanitarian crisis enveloping Myanmar, whose dreams of democracy were shattered in 1962 when Ne Win, commander of the armed forces, embarked on an ill-fated push toward socialist totalitarianism that brought the army to the center of society. Under Ne Win and his successors, the Burmese military rulers -- the State Peace and Development Council -- have become convinced that foreigners are trying to destroy them, a view that shapes international relations and their persecution of democracy campaigners, including Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, under house arrest in Yangon.
Over the past decade, up to 1 million people like Ko Min Shah have been exiled to "satellite zones" and "labor camps," where they build bridges, military camps, irrigation systems and oil and gas pipelines. Forever denying the extent of the slave camps, Myanmar's junta last week announced a "historic deal" with the International Labor Organization (ILO) allowing victims of the camps over the past 40 years to seek compensation without fear of retaliation.
The ILO claims the junta will establish a "complaint mechanism," but so far not one victim has so much as contacted the ILO.
In Myanmar today, there is no free speech. The universities, historically a source of political activism, have been virtually dismantled by the regime. Owning a computer modem or a fax is illegal, and anyone talking to a foreign journalist is at risk of torture and jail.
Working here is risky and unpredictable. Obtaining entry as a journalist is practically unheard of, forcing reporters, including myself, to enter as a tourist. The state -- and in particular the Director of Defense Services Intelligence (DDSI) -- conducts surveillance of "suspicious foreigners" and one can expect e-mails, phones and contact with locals to be intensely monitored. Taxis are bugged; internet cafe owners take periodic "snapshots" of customers' monitors.
Last week, I was stopped outside a Yangon bar and questioned by three men, inevitably DDSI. After confiscating my passport, they took me to a police station and questioned me for several hours about my family, education and movements in India, where I live. It was clear they had been following me for at least 24 hours. I was finally thrown out in the early hours of the morning on to an empty street miles from my hotel.
The International Committee of the Red Cross has just been ordered to close its offices, ending its humanitarian work in border areas, where 500,000 tribespeople live in fear of the military, and around the new capital, Naypyitaw, where gulag-style camps exist.
The road there can be fatal, warn the few aid workers left in the dismal bars of Yangon. No one knows what prompted the junta to relocate Myanmar's capital to this isolated, dusty place 320km from Yangon.
The first brick was laid in November 2005, a date apparently chosen by an astrologer. The first to move, last year, were elements of the military, who forcibly recruited thousands of local people to build garrisons and a major dam to generate electricity; 100,000 slaves are thought to be building it.
Mway Khaing, one of some 20,000 Mon villagers forced to work on the roads to Naypyitaw, said: "Soldiers came at night to my village last January. Young and old, women and men, older children, we were treated alike, like animals and slaves. Those who ran were shot in the back. A mother-of-four, my neighbor, was tied to a pole and raped. They tied a huge stone around her neck and left her to be eaten alive by the ants."
Yangon has seen its first protests since 1987. At the heart of the protests has been the country's staggering inflation.
Across the country, electronic goods are endlessly repaired and recycled, for want of replacements: all over Yangon, tradesmen can be seen gluing books back together, soldering ancient transistors or respooling the tape on old audio-cassettes. The generals claim the economy is growing at 10 percent a year.
With the average salary about 1,300 kyats (US$1) a day and the price of a small bag of rice at least 400 kyats, life under the twin blights of military rule and international sanctions is becoming increasingly intolerable.
"Why do human rights abuses like forced labor camps continue to grow in Burma," asks David Mathieson from New York-based Human Rights Watch in Thailand. "Well, you could start by asking its neighbors. The junta has deftly played them off one another, notably China and India, as they compete for regional influence and natural resources, including natural gas."
"Generals have become masters at turning energy deals into protection money and where do you think that the money is going to go? It's not going to education or health programs -- it's going to the military to build a better command center in the mountains to repress the population."
Last year, Russia, also a major arms supplier to the regime, voted against putting Myanmar on the UN Security Council agenda. The very same day, Russia's state-owned Zarubezhneft oil company was awarded Moscow's first contract to explore Myanmar's offshore oil and gas reserves.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry