A lot has been said in the media over the last week about the National Socialism Association, an organization cofounded by a political science student at National Chengchi University that professes to admire certain facets of Germany's World War II era Nazi party and its leader Adolf Hitler. The story was quickly picked up by the international press and resulted in sensational headlines appearing in many publications across the globe -- publications that normally rarely mention Taiwan.
Even the director of the Israeli representative office in Taipei, Rafi Gamzou, was drawn into the uproar and felt compelled to comment, denouncing the emergence of a pro-Nazi movement in Taiwan and questioning the nation's education system.
The government, embarrassed by the media frenzy, was forced to deal with the bad publicity and issue a warning via the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the group, asking it to cancel a planned event.
But rather than reveal Taiwan as a nation of extremists, all the attention has done is expose the naivete of youth and a lack of awareness of what Nazi symbolism means to millions of people around the world.
As mentioned by the Israeli representative, the inadequacies of the nation's China-centric education system mean many people, young and old, receive little education about what happened in Europe during World War II and remain largely unaware of the brutality and the atrocities committed by the Nazi regime.
This is borne out by the sometimes tasteless usage of Hitler and Nazi imagery in the promotion of products and the penchant among some Taiwanese for Nazi kitsch such as German World War II-style motorcycle helmets and swastika badges.
But this episode also demonstrates the efficacy of the global network of pro-Jewish activists that root out any alleged pro-Nazi or anti-Semitic activity and expose it for the whole world to see.
How else could such an obscure group (the association has just 20 paid-up members) make headlines around the world? The problem stems from the group's use of the term Nazi, which is automatically associated, wrongly in this case, with being anti-Semitic.
The group never had an-anti Jewish platform, and this was reiterated by the group's cofounder, who told reporters he bore no malice to Jewish people and that all he wanted to do was promote a strong sense of nationalism, traditional Chinese values and limit the numbers of immigrant workers coming to Taiwan.
Another of the group's cofounders, however, did talk about exterminating the offspring of immigrant workers on the association's Web forum, and this is something the authorities should look into.
But despite such extreme views, the story was blown out of all proportion by the international press, and the crazed Internet rantings of a few right-wing students did not deserve the amount of column inches that the group received.
Nevertheless, those involved will learn from this experience and probably regret ever evoking the memory of Hitler as a way of promoting their ideas.
The firestorm of criticism and media attention created by their activities will most likely dampen enthusiasm for political activity for many of the group's members.
Indeed, the group's Web site has already been temporarily closed until further notice and just one person turned up to the association's inaugural convention in Taichung last Saturday.
And despite the announcement on Sunday that it wants to form a National Socialist Party, the group will in all likelihood disappear back into obscurity, where it belongs.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs