Tolerance of the weak
Dear Johnny,
Here's my support for you to continue writing under a pseudonym. What many people don't realize is that a short time ago, doing otherwise would have landed you an extended holiday on a prison island. As for propaganda, any media studies student past his first week could tell you that no media outlet is entirely objective or without a mission statement of some kind. The Taipei Times clearly states its position, which is a bit more honest than TVBS, the Apple Daily and CNN.
Speaking of which, CNN's Anjali Rao came up very short when Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang (
A situation in which the majority of a country's population can be fearmongered into accepting an imported sense of nationality through politically manipulated -- and foreign-owned -- media is a testament to extraordinary tolerance only possible under a democracy, rather than an indictment of it.
Your thoughts?
Ben Goren
Taiwan Defense Force
International Martyrs
Johnny replies: These last weeks have been difficult for me. The night after this newspaper published that reader's letter saying that Johnny Neihu is a fake and that my columns should not be written, I came home and lay down in bed, thinking about what it all meant, when my gal Cathy Pacific suddenly rolled over, looked at me square in the eye and said: "I feel like I don't really know you."
"Cathy," I said, after it dawned on me that she had seen the letter, "I'm the figment of a shameless mind. You cannot possibly begin to know me. Now get some sleep, for God's sake."
There's truth in what you say, Ben. But the question bounces back: How do you separate tolerance from being vulnerable to manipulation? The former suggests a society has a critical mass of reasonable people. But you say the majority of Taiwanese are unreasonable because they cannot withstand malicious propaganda. Are such people worth your advocacy, let alone martyrdom?
He's got a little list
Dear Johnny,
I'm an American teacher in Kaohsiung. I've lived in Taiwan for 12 years. I love your column and can't wait to get the paper on Saturday to read it. You are right on the money time and time again.
I also love your use of vocabulary. I have a series of word lists I teach my students, and you are always using those words so I can show them your column for examples of the words I'm teaching that are in print.
Don't let losers like Justin Robinette get you down (Johnny Neihu's Mailbag, March 10, page 8). Everyone I know here in Kaohsiung loves your column.
Rock on,
Paul
Johnny replies: I hope they're adult students, Paul, because with my language you could get into trouble if they're not. By the way, how many people do you know in Kaohsiung? There's gotta be a way I can make money out of this. How about: The Johnny Neihu Cram School -- "Get Neihu in your noggin."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations