Three years ago this month, international terrorism struck Europe. In simultaneous bomb attacks on trains in Madrid, Islamist terrorists killed 191 people and wounded over 2,000. Last month the suspects went on trial in a Spanish court.
Violent extremists claiming to act in the name of Islam have attacked many countries around the world, before and after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US. But the attacks in Madrid -- and in London in July 2005 -- showed that Europe is one of their prime targets, prompting governments to respond by bolstering their defenses, including at the level of the EU.
In the past three years, security standards at European ports and airports have been strengthened, biometric passports have been introduced and terrorist financing targeted. More than 2,000 terrorism suspects and those suspected of other major forms of crime have been arrested and extradited on the basis of a European Arrest Warrant.
Similarly, European security and intelligence services have pooled resources in a common center for threat analysis in Brussels. Through Europol and Eurojust, European police forces and judicial authorities have intensified cooperation and ministers are preparing to grant law enforcement agencies of other EU countries access to national databases of DNA and fingerprints.
For the first time, security-related research figures prominently in the EU budget, with US$1.4 billion earmarked for this purpose. European police and security agencies have prevented many terrorist attacks.
But, while Europe's defenses have been strengthened considerably, the threat of terrorism has not diminished. The risk of new attacks in Europe and worldwide is serious and will remain so for the foreseeable future. To face this global threat, international cooperation must be improved. In particular, Muslims and non-Muslims need to combine their efforts to defend the sanctity of human life.
First, the world must work from common standards. Many countries still need to improve their defenses and implement the 16 counter-terrorism instruments established by the UN, including the convention against terrorist financing. Reducing the risk of terrorists obtaining weapons of mass destruction equally requires stronger international cooperation.
To this end, the EU is working closely with its partners, from Morocco and Indonesia to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states. The EU will extend support to the African Union's Center for Counter-Terrorism in Algiers. Cooperation with India, Pakistan and Russia has also been strengthened, and the Union will continue to work closely with the US, Japan and Australia.
Second, more must be done to address the international conflicts that terrorists seek to exploit. Afghanistan remains a critical front-line state in the fight against terrorism. The Taliban must not be allowed to bomb Afghanistan back in time. The EU will increase its aid, notably in support of the Afghan police.
Likewise, efforts to bring peace to the Middle East remain essential. While progress on the road to peace between Israel and the Palestinians would not by itself stop terrorism, it would deal a powerful blow to terrorist incitement and propaganda. EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy Javier Solana will continue to press for results.
Third, we must counter the ideology of the terrorists. Very few Muslims want to live under a seventh century-style caliphate. They prefer to live in freedom and in parliamentary democracies.
What unites Muslims and non-Muslims is a commitment to basic human rights. To respect and promote human rights is critical to winning the battle for hearts and minds, including in Europe. This means that governments need to practice what they preach. Detention without trial is counterproductive in the fight against terrorism. So is torture. To defeat the terrorists we must offer a vision of a more just and equitable world and act accordingly, at home and abroad. Ultimately, the values of liberty and justice are our best defense.
Gijs de Vries is the EU's counter-terrorism coordinator.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.