A rare encounter between senior US and Iranian diplomats over the weekend may be a symbolic breakthrough for the longtime foes, but did little to bridge their deep divisions, analysts said.
The meeting during a conference on Saturday in Baghdad on Iraq's future involved the highest-level exchanges between the two nations in four years and raised hopes that escalating crises over Iran's nuclear and regional ambitions could be resolved through diplomacy rather than military confrontation.
Washington's ambassador to Baghdad, Zalmay Khalilzad, described his talks as "constructive" and even "jovial" -- not a term normally used to illustrate US-Iran dealings during the past 27 years of enmity.
Khalilzad expressed optimism that Saturday's meeting, which focussed on efforts to end sectarian bloodshed and an al-Qaeda insurgency in Iraq, would lead to another face-to-face parley at the foreign ministers' level next month.
"That certainly is a possible path for how things could develop from here," he said.
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said she would attend the next meeting, probably in Istanbul.
Saturday's talks were welcomed by foreign policy experts who have been pressing both Rice and US President George W. Bush to end their diplomatic boycott of Iran and ally Syria, even though they viewed the talks as having broken no new ground on substantive matters.
"The Baghdad meeting was quite useful in changing the understanding and perception of what the US is doing," said Patrick Clawson, an Iran analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Shibley Telhami of the Brookings Institution agreed that the main success of the conference was that the two sides met and kept their exchanges low-key enough to avoid a blow-up that would torpedo the follow up ministerial meeting.
"Neither side wanted this to be a failed meeting, and it wasn't. But it also means that nothing else was accomplished," he said.
The talks followed a period of US sabre-rattling on Iran, including the deployment of two US carrier battle groups in the Persian Gulf, both over the Iraq situation and Tehran's refusal to halt uranium enrichment activities Washington says are a cover for producing a nuclear bomb.
The US went into Saturday's meeting determined to limit discussions to its allegations that Iran and Syria are providing arms and other support to sectarian militia and anti-US insurgents in Iraq.
"We made clear that kind of behavior is wholly inconsistent with the pledges of both those countries to a stable, secure, peaceful Iraq, and that those behaviors need to stop," said David Satterfield, Rice's top Iraq adviser who attended the meeting with Khalilzad.
The Iranian delegates rejected the charges in a heated exchange that underscored the gulf still separating the two rivals.
"The sparring shows how difficult it's going to be to actually have a substantive agreement between the United States and Iran on many of the issues that separate them," Clawson said.
"I don't see any indication that Iran has made the fundamental decision that its interests require cooperation with the United States to promote stability in Iraq," he said.
The Bush administration's refusal to let the bilateral discussions bleed over into other disputes, notably on Iran's nuclear program, also undermines the diplomatic push.
"The Iranians have an interest in what happens in Iraq, no doubt, but they also have a lot of other issues pertaining to broader Gulf security and their nuclear program and all of these are connected," Telhami said.
"It's hard in the end for the United States to get full cooperation from the Iranians on the issues that matter most for the US, without them getting something in return," he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry