In January, members of the Foundation of Medical Professionals' Alliance in Taiwan, where I serve as president, visited all the representatives of EU countries in Taiwan to thank them for their support of the nation's "meaningful participation" in the WHO.
Although both the US and Japan have expressed support for the nation's bid to obtain observer status at the WHO, the EU member states have expressed reservations on the matter. Nonetheless, we appreciate the EU's support for Taiwan's "meaningful participation."
We realize, however, that unless Taiwan obtains full WHO membership, all forms of assistance will be limited.
During the SARS crisis, China attempted to cover up the severity of the epidemic within its national borders. Given Taiwan's lack of WHO representation, Taiwanese suffered and global health security was threatened. Last year, Bei-jing also had to curb a rabies outbreak that killed 1,735 people between January and August. And just on March 1, the WHO once again confirmed a case of human infection with the H5N1 avian flu virus in Fujian Province.
The "three small links" and rampant smuggling activities between Taiwan's outlying islands of Kinmen and Matsu and China's Fujian Province put Taiwan at risk of bird flu transmission. Beijing had already shown during the SARS crisis its duplicity and inability to control epidemic outbreaks, putting Taiwan's health security at risk.
Taiwan urgently needs to collaborate with the WHO to prevent a repetition of a SARS-like tragedy. Only by obtaining full WHO membership can Taiwan gain full access to information on epidemics. This is why we urge the EU to support Taiwan's bid for WHO membership.
WHO legal counsel Gian Luca Burci once said in private that WHO meetings cover so many fields that it was hard to tell how many meetings the global body organizes each year and how many "meaningful meetings" Taiwan has been excluded from. Accordingly, it is meaningless to discuss the number of meetings in which Taiwan was allowed to join.
In 2005, a secret memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed by the WHO Secretariat and Beijing stated that any information or invitation the WHO plans to extend to Taiwan must first be approved by China. For Taiwan to participate in a WHO meeting, it should ask for permission from the WHO, which in turn would ask for Beijing's approval -- a process that takes around four weeks to complete. Even if Taiwanese experts are allowed to participate in WHO meetings, they are open to unreasonable obstruction from Beijing, which is what happened several times last year.
We therefore urge the WHO to refrain from signing anymore MOUs with China without informing other member states. An international organization like the WHO should uphold transparency. This kind of secret deal may damage the interest not only of Taiwan but also of other WHO member states, prompting doubts about the organization's ability to govern. It is ridiculous that China, which has hundreds of missiles aimed at?Taiwan, is allowed to filter information the WHO forwards to Taiwan.
Such behavior on the WHO's part diminishes its status to that of a Chinese -- rather than a world -- health organization. We therefore call on all WHO member states to urge the international agency to publicize the details of the MOU it signed with China to ensure that Taiwan is not excluded from the international community for political reasons.
The WHO should also accept Taiwan as a member state to prove that its founding spirit and guidelines are meaningful.
Wu Shu-min is the president of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry