Recently, as reported by the Chicago Tribune on Feb. 20, a spokesperson from the US State Department denounced Taiwan's decision to rename many of its government-owned companies, substituting "China" for "Taiwan."
Although historians claim that Taiwan has never belonged to China, the author of the article gave a couple of examples of areas where the lines have been blurred. His article pointed out that while on an official visit in the US, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) cringed when the announcer at an official ceremony said that the orchestra would now play the national anthem of the Republic of China (ROC). And China Airlines, the main Taiwanese carrier, does not fly to Beijing, nor anywhere else in China, for that matter.
The State Department's lack of support for Taiwan's efforts to reclaim its identity is a significant shift in opinion since 1971.
That was the year when the US Congress enacted the Taiwan Relations Act in order to protect Taiwan from the People's Republic of China (PRC). This followed the UN's decision to hand over Taiwan's seat at the UN to the PRC.
If then US president Jimmy Carter and the US Congress were comfortable referring to the ROC as Taiwan back then, why is it that the State Department is suddenly so sensitive about it today?
For the past 20 years Taiwan has had significant name recognition in the US, inspiring consumer confidence among Americans who scoop up everything from clothing to high-tech electronics when they see a tag that says: "Made in Taiwan." Taiwan is the fourth-largest import and export partner of the US.
Sharing the same values as the US -- democracy, human rights and the social well-being of its people -- Taiwan is without a doubt a democratic country where the people have proudly elected their president three times in the past 12 years.
Taiwan has been an advocate in Central America as well as Africa for economic freedom and industrial modernization, proving it is a supportive ally in what is increasingly becoming a boundary-less global village.
The rising economic and diplomatic powers of the PRC, combined with the growing complexity of international politics, has caused Taiwan to become increasingly isolated.
If the global community starts to confuse Taiwan with China, it would open the way for China to take Taiwan over by force.
Why the US, a friend of democracy, would encourage a communist regime that has committed human rights violations to take over a democratic country is incomprehensible.
To oppose Taiwan's efforts to preserve its name and identity and distinguish itself from China goes against US values of choosing, fostering and supporting democracy.
Tien Cheng
Chicago, Illinois
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with