In the bad old days of martial law, if the subject of the 228 Incident was brought up by overseas guests -- and that was very rare -- the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) blamed "hoodlums" and communist insurgents for the violence. Occasionally, the government would attack the Japanese, blaming them for instilling anti-China sentiment in the population.
During the unrest of the 228 Incident, however, rumors circulated of Japanese forces in the mountains that were training Taiwanese to attack KMT troops. Nothing captured this hysteria more than the stupidity of dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
Contemptible nonsense, but the rumors endured into the early 1950s, when there was still concern that the Japanese might attack from within.
This year's anniversary of the 228 Incident cannot be allowed to pass without a final commentary on a theory so preposterous that even the KMT of that era did not peddle it -- namely, that Japan was primarily responsible for the 228 Incident.
This theory was announced this week by a number of academics led by Chu Hong-yuan (
The group's evidence was sparse, speculative and selective, ignoring the scope of the available literature and primary sources. They chose to discount all information that points to Taiwanese anger at KMT misrule as the primary spark of the uprising and to the massacre of many civilians as premeditated.
Chu also attacked George Kerr -- in 1947 a naval attache to the US embassy and later an academic, and one of the few foreign witnesses of 228 to publish on his experiences -- as conducting a pro-independence campaign and sparking discontent with the Chiang regime. And -- surprise, surprise -- Chu is one of the key progenitors of the conspiracy theory that President Chen Shui-bian (
Chu has since been accused of misappropriating the names of other Academia Sinica researchers to lend weight to his group's campaign of 228 denial.
Hwang Chang-chien this week whitewashed the late General Peng Meng-chi (
Chi Chia-lin previously attacked Bruce Jacobs (
In parts of Europe it is an offense to deny the Holocaust or to employ fascist imagery such as the swastika, punishable by imprisonment, as Holocaust revisionist David Irving found in Austria last year.
In Taiwan, the scope for freedom of speech is wider: The threshold of tolerance for those who deny crimes of the past is high. Extremists therefore serve an extra function: They give fuel to the hardliners that run the KMT machine. The KMT at one time was so impressed with Chu Hong-yuan that it nominated him as a National Assembly representative.
All this should also give readers pause when attaching weight to the words of academics at the Academia Sinica, which is a church so broad now, it seems, that just about any crackpot can get a stipend.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations