In the bad old days of martial law, if the subject of the 228 Incident was brought up by overseas guests -- and that was very rare -- the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) blamed "hoodlums" and communist insurgents for the violence. Occasionally, the government would attack the Japanese, blaming them for instilling anti-China sentiment in the population.
During the unrest of the 228 Incident, however, rumors circulated of Japanese forces in the mountains that were training Taiwanese to attack KMT troops. Nothing captured this hysteria more than the stupidity of dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
Contemptible nonsense, but the rumors endured into the early 1950s, when there was still concern that the Japanese might attack from within.
This year's anniversary of the 228 Incident cannot be allowed to pass without a final commentary on a theory so preposterous that even the KMT of that era did not peddle it -- namely, that Japan was primarily responsible for the 228 Incident.
This theory was announced this week by a number of academics led by Chu Hong-yuan (
The group's evidence was sparse, speculative and selective, ignoring the scope of the available literature and primary sources. They chose to discount all information that points to Taiwanese anger at KMT misrule as the primary spark of the uprising and to the massacre of many civilians as premeditated.
Chu also attacked George Kerr -- in 1947 a naval attache to the US embassy and later an academic, and one of the few foreign witnesses of 228 to publish on his experiences -- as conducting a pro-independence campaign and sparking discontent with the Chiang regime. And -- surprise, surprise -- Chu is one of the key progenitors of the conspiracy theory that President Chen Shui-bian (
Chu has since been accused of misappropriating the names of other Academia Sinica researchers to lend weight to his group's campaign of 228 denial.
Hwang Chang-chien this week whitewashed the late General Peng Meng-chi (
Chi Chia-lin previously attacked Bruce Jacobs (
In parts of Europe it is an offense to deny the Holocaust or to employ fascist imagery such as the swastika, punishable by imprisonment, as Holocaust revisionist David Irving found in Austria last year.
In Taiwan, the scope for freedom of speech is wider: The threshold of tolerance for those who deny crimes of the past is high. Extremists therefore serve an extra function: They give fuel to the hardliners that run the KMT machine. The KMT at one time was so impressed with Chu Hong-yuan that it nominated him as a National Assembly representative.
All this should also give readers pause when attaching weight to the words of academics at the Academia Sinica, which is a church so broad now, it seems, that just about any crackpot can get a stipend.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China