In France's pre-presidential electoral campaign, European affairs are mentioned or whispered, but almost never debated. France is mostly concerned with its own problems, particularly the supposed malfunctioning of its political class and the apparent laziness of the French public, which is blamed for weak economic growth, especially when compared to the US. France needs a debate on EU affairs, but only as long as it does not degenerate -- as is common in Europe -- into self-flagellation.
But the germ of such a debate exists and it sounds very different from that which dominated the failed constitutional referendum campaign in France two years ago. The operation of European institutions -- the European Central Bank, the European Commission and the Stability Pact -- is facing severe criticism, but not in the name of a nostalgia for national sovereignty. Europe is not being rejected; instead, the criticism has been in the spirit of improving European institutions in the name of the common good.
Both of the major candidates for the French presidency, Segolene Royal and Interior Minister Nicholas Sarkozy, have called for the creation of an economic government for the euro zone. Of course, such a "government" already exists in the form of the European Central Bank (ECB). But what is needed is an institutional framework that would establish greater political responsibility concerning the primary economic objectives that Europe should pursue -- full employment and growth -- and that would at least partly close the democratic deficit implied by the ECB's takeover of monetary policy from euro-zone states.
A moment of seeming political disunity, such as exists today, may not seem the right one to initiate such a project. But, historically, Europe has succeeded when, at moments of danger, it has initiated irreversible processes that outweigh any other consideration. Europe's founding fathers understood this when they hatched the idea of creating the European Coal and Steel Community: Encouraging old enemies to pool some of the most powerful tools of war under the pretext of advancing their economic interests was a strategy of rare intelligence.
We now live in a similar moment of uncertainty and danger, and this time, too, there is a project, both economic and political, that can unite the EU: energy independence, a key factor in national sovereignty. Today, there is nothing on a pan-European scale that guarantees the responsibility of each member state to ensure the security of its future supplies.
The European Commission is weary of trying to build a single energy market, which has required it to persuade governments that they must dismantle their existing monopoly operators -- a prerequisite to competition. Although member states appear to have resigned themselves to this, they fervently resist other European firms taking control of their "national champion" companies.
To be sure, governments cannot escape their responsibilities to their citizens, and only the most naive technocrat believes that the market alone can ensure energy independence. At the same time, however, purely bilateral negotiations between individual EU members and oil and gas-producing countries weakens the member states' bargaining power, as well as undermining Europe's geopolitical weight in world affairs.
Yet, fortunately, there is no need for resignation. There is an obvious solution, similar to the Coal and Steel Community implemented by our founding fathers: a European energy, environment and research community (E3RC). It is a mistake to believe that ecological concerns can be addressed only through negative growth. In fact, the opposite is true. New energy and environmental technologies will undoubtedly drive growth in the future.
But only if research is doubled to create new energy-efficient technologies will we eventually consume less energy overall and more energy in an environmentally friendly way. The ecological disasters that today's economic activity has already produced and the catastrophic potential of those to come have at last brought home the fact that energy policy and environmental protection cannot be separated.
The E3RC would pursue two directly related objectives: European energy independence and Europe's increased bargaining power in global markets.
Jean-Paul Fitoussi is president of the French Observatory of Economic Conditions.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs