Mon, Feb 26, 2007 - Page 9 News List

Nukes that may never go away

The US and its allies can talk as much as they like, but North Korean nuclear weapons are here to stay for a long time yet, and all for reasons of hard strategy

By Richard Halloran

In the days right after North Korea signed an agreement that would supposedly require its nuclear disarmament, North Korean leader Kim Jong-il made clear that he had no intention of giving up those weapons.

The consequences of that stance are likely to be far-reaching.

US President George W. Bush and South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun, both having labeled the agreement a step toward getting North Korea to abandon nuclear arms, will most likely be shown to have been naive or, worse, deceptive.

No political leaders seem to have any idea what they will do if they are forced to accept North Korea into that small circle of nations with nuclear arms, a development that will change the balance of power in Asia.

Nor has anyone confronted the crack that a nuclear North Korea will cause in the nuclear non-proliferation regime that has stayed afloat for four decades. In particular, the example of North Korea will complicate negotiations with Iran on similar issues.

The agreement that North Korea signed in Beijing at the six-party talks with China, Japan, South Korea, Russia and the US on Feb. 13 says Pyongyang "will shut down and seal for the purpose of eventual abandonment" its nuclear facilities and provide the other five with "a list of all its nuclear programs."

On that same day, however, the North Koreans, through their official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), said Pyongyang had agreed only to a "temporary suspension of the operation of its nuclear facilities." Further, North Korea ignored most of the other provisions of the agreement, such as denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula.

That began a steady drum roll of belligerent statements asserting Pyongyang's right to and need for nuclear arms. An official newspaper, Rodong Sinmun, charged that the US sought to dominate Asia "through preemptive nuclear attack."

KCNA said North Korea's "status of a full-fledged nuclear weapons state successfully realized the long-cherished desire of the Korean nation to have matchless national power."

In another dispatch, KCNA said: "Kim Jong-il punctured the arrogance of the US imperialists with a powerful nuclear deterrent."

On Kim Jong-il's birthday, a national holiday on Feb. 16, a Communist Party committee lauded him thus: "You have turned the homeland ... into a power having nuclear deterrent for self-defense and made the Korean nation emerge a nuclear weapons nation which no force can ever provoke."

At a banquet that evening, which was aired by the Korean Central Broadcasting Station, the president of the Supreme People's Assembly, Kim Yong-nam, toasted Kim Jong-il for, among other things, turning North Korea into "a military power that even possesses a self-defensive nuclear deterrent."

Still more: The North Koreans fell back on a time-worn argument -- the Americans made us do it. Using North Korea's proper name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), KCNA asserted: "US policy compelled the DPRK to have access to nuclear deterrence for self-defense."

Some observers question the value of statements from Communist officials. Experience has shown, however, that Communist leaders, when addressing their home audiences as in this case, tell the public what they really want their people to believe.

Former South Korean foreign minister Han Sung-joo has published an assessment of the reasons the North Koreans want nuclear arms. Writing in Time magazine, Han said:

This story has been viewed 3206 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top