A heated debate is raging on about whether the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) drive to remove statues of dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
Is it really inappropriate to remove such statues?
Dictators throughout history have had a tendency to imprint their personas onto the societies they control. Statues placed near centers of power, such as government and military buildings, attempt to convey the power of the dictator.
Statues placed in public areas and buildings bearing the dictator's name and coins or bills bearing the dictator's image attempt to convey the ubiquitous reach of the dictator's power.
The purpose of such images is to glorify and legitimize the dictator's rule over the public.
Chiang's statues are no exception.
Like Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, Chinese leader Mao Zedong (
Many of these statues were erected by the dictator himself and not by an admiring public.
Now that Chiang is gone, along with authoritarian rule, the statues no longer serve their original purpose.
In fact, they seem very out of place in a democratic country, where voters -- not dictators -- wield power.
Some KMT politicians claim that the statues serve the purpose of teaching the population about Chiang's role in the nation's history.
Without a doubt, Chiang played an important role, but the memory of such history is best kept in history books, where words can explain the complexities of Taiwan's history better than any bronze reproduction.
Moreover, Chiang already has a grandiose memorial in Taipei.
In the end, Taiwan's history museums are the most appropriate place for Chiang's statues.
The statues now only serve to symbolize and preserve the KMT's influence over government institutions.
For this reason, the KMT is reluctant to see the statues removed.
As an opposition party, such thinking is understandable, but nevertheless it has no place in a multi-party state, where no party should have a permanent claim over any public institution.
Allowing Chiang's statues to continue standing on public land suggests that any Taiwanese leader could permanently impose his image onto public grounds.
Imagine President Chen Shui-bian (
Such a proposition would not only be very unpopular, considering Chen 's poor ratings, it would also contravene the notion that leaders should serve the public and not themselves.
Commissioning a statue of one's image using state funds is as self-serving as helping oneself to the state's coffers.
Portraits of Chen do appear in government buildings as far away as the culture centers run by the Overseas Compatriots Affairs Commission in the US. The beauty of democracy is that such portraits will be taken down as soon as the next president is elected.
The term of Chiang's rule has long expired.
It's time for Chiang's statues to retire from their roles as facilitators of a dictator's personality cult and peacefully live out the rest of their days in museums -- the proper nursing homes for historical artifacts.
Jonathan Hwang
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and