Maurizio Seracini claims not to be pleased that he is the only person mentioned by his real name in The Da Vinci Code. A scientist turned art detective, he has no need for any manufactured mystery around Leonardo. For 32 years he has chased a real one -- and he seems now, finally, posed to solve it.
It is a long, and satisfyingly complex, story. But it can be summed up with one question: What happened to The Battle of Anghiari, a grimacing crunch of men and horses considered by some experts to be Leonardo's greatest painting?
Seracini thinks he knows, and he was recently given permission to restart his search, which involves using the most modern detecting equipment to peer through a 500-year-old wall in the Palazzo Vecchio here. On that wall, in 2002, he found a tantalizing crevice behind a Vasari fresco where the Leonardo may be.
If he succeeds, he could bring to light what one Leonardo scholar calls potentially "one of the great art finds of all time." Or he could find nothing. Or he could find the painting wrecked by time and its own defects. In any case, after three obsessive decades Seracini is very much on the hook.
"I have to say, there is enough here to make you scratch your head -- scratch it to the point of losing your hair," Seracini, a dapper 60 with, so far anyway, a full head of white hair, said as he stood in the room where he believes the painting is hidden. "It's very intimidating."
One of the few certainties is that the painting, or at least a part of it depicting a fight for a standard, did exist on the wall of the Palazzo Vec-chio, the old home of the Medicis.
"Friday the 6th of June, 1505, at the stroke of the 13th hour," Leonar-do wrote in one of his notebooks, "I started to paint in the palace."
His younger rival, Michel-angelo, had also been commissioned to paint his own battle scene on the opposing wall. Michelangelo left for Rome and never began painting it.
But both men produced preparatory cartoons considered not only among the finest ever created but exemplary of the two strains of Renaissance the men embodied: Michelangelo drew heroic bathing nudes; Leonardo worked the motion and fury of men and horses in action.
Vasari called Leonardo's cartoon "most excellent and masterful for its marvelous treatment of figures in flight."
But Leonardo started much and finished little. Technical problems -- he painted not on wet plaster like traditional fresco, but with oils on a wax-impregnated wall -- haunted him.
Only a small portion was completed, though it was Leonardo's largest painting, perhaps 4.5m by 6m, and as extraordinary as the cartoon. Several copies were made, one by Rubens. Even in 1549, a letter writer urged a friend to have a look, calling it a "marvelous thing."
Beginning in the 1560s, Vasari, who also built what is now the Uffizi museum, began work to restructure the room. He enlarged it and covered both walls with his own grand battle fresco. Leo-nardo's painting disappeared. But, of course, it was not forgotten.
In the early 1970s, Seracini, a former medical student studying bioengineering in California, took an art course at University of California, Los Angeles, from one of the leading Leonardo experts, an Italian professor, Carlo Pedretti. In 1975, Seracini returned to Florence, his hometown, and by chance linked up anew with Pedretti, who had begun a search for the lost painting, theorizing that it still lay behind Vasari's fresco.
It was then, on a scaffolding, that Seracini, a lowly but enthusiastic assistant, found on a flag in Vasari's painting what he considered a possible sign from Vasari of what lay behind it: the words Cerca, trova, or "Seek and ye shall find."
"I was puzzled, curious," he said. "I said: `OK, cool it. Maybe it's nothing. Maybe it's a coincidence.'"
Seracini admits that considering the words a clue is not scientific, and though they are friends, Pedretti dismisses Seracini's interest in the words. They were a motto for one of the companies in the battle, he said, not some mysterious clue.
"We Italians are a little inclined to superstition," he said.
That search ended without success in 1977. Pedretti dropped out of the active hunt. But Seracini never let it leave his mind as he developed a career using his engineering training and modern equipment to analyze works of art.
His most contentious finding also landed him his unwelcome place in The Da Vinci Code. In 2001, he proved that the paint in Leonardo's Adoration of the Magi was not applied by the master himself but much later and, as Seracini said at the time, by someone who was "not even a very good artist."
In 2000, Seracini took up work on the Anghiari painting again, using radar and then thermography on the walls. Two years later he discovered a tiny crevice behind that panel. In short, Vasari may have preserved the Leonardo by building a wall for his own fresco an inch or so away from the original wall.
"Why would you destroy it when you knew it was done by Leonardo and it was still visible?" Seracini said, adding that Vasari had similarly preserved works by lesser artists.
In 2002, his work was frozen, and this being Italy, it is not entirely clear why. Seracini chalks it up to local politics that he prefers not to discuss. But late last year the nation's new culture minister, Francesco Rutelli, ordered the work begun again.
The challenge before Seracini is great. He cannot touch the Vasari, a treasure on its own, and instead must find a way to peer behind it with machines that do not yet exist. He has several theoretical methods, including a machine that would detect the pigment Leonardo used. There are records of the pigments, paid for by the city, of lead white, vermillion and a blue that might be lapis lazuli.
"This is a hell of a challenge," he said. "How do you come here with equipment that doesn't exist, solving a problem of seeing through walls without touching anything?"
Even if he finds nothing, Seracini said he had no doubt that his work would be worthwhile, if only from the standpoint of having developed the technology to say whether it is there or not.
"I don't have a reason not to find out," he said. "I think it's about time, since I started just 32 years ago."
Pedretti and Martin Kemp, another top Leonardo expert, strongly support the research, though no one is sure what might be found. Vasari himself said the wall on which Leonardo painted was in bad shape even in Leonardo's time.
"I think Maurizio's optimism is greater than mine," Kemp said. "But this is not to say I think that his investigation should not reach its full conclusion. If we stop here it will just be tantalizing."
"This would be great thing. I would be happy with just a few square inches," Pedretti said.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the